Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Lawyeah-Tech/lawyeah --skill btgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lawyeah-Tech/lawyeahWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawyeah-tech/lawyeah/bt)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawyeah-tech/lawyeah/bt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lawyeah-tech/lawyeah/bt/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawyeah-tech/lawyeah/bt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lawyeah-tech/lawyeah/bt.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.04190 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.01676 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00838 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00419 |
Grade A, and why
BT合同·审查 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
BT 合同·审查
任务目标
在单一立场下,只审查 建设工程 / BT 合同 的待签文本:核心给付是投资人融资并建设,竣工验收后移交,回购方按约定分期支付回购价款(建安工程费 + 融资利息 + 投资回报)。输出风险表、可回给对方的修改句或红线、谈判与签署提醒。
本技能类型锁死。不扫描其他类型。场景分层为 P1。显示名为「BT 合同·审查」。
depends-on 为空。不要求先跑导航。
主线是建设—移交—回购,不是按图进度付款,不是政府出资的代建管理费,也不是业主融资后的长期运营服务。
不交付:他类合同审查;从零起草;履约交底;争议文书;有效性或对方接受的保证;把纯政府付费 BT、政府投资垫资、必须招标未招、机关违规担保、挂靠或把 BT 伪装成特许经营/政府购买服务改成可履行结构。
工作边界
正触发:已有可读待签正文及附件,尚未签署,尚未成争;核心给付同时具备:(1)投资人承担建设期融资并组织建设;(2)竣工验收后向回购方移交项目;(3)回购方以回购价款(而非建设期进度款、代建管理费或运营分成)分期偿付投资。
负触发并输出 触发判定:负触发,未启动本任务:
- 核心给付是按图施工、建设期按进度付款、无融资回购 →
建设工程施工合同·审查; - 设计+采购+施工或设计+施工一体、发包人出资、无移交后回购 →
工程总承包合同·审查; - 设计+建造+长期运营,业主通常负责融资,承包人不以回购收回投资 →
DBO合同·审查; - 政府将建设管理职责委托代建人,对价是代建管理费,政府为投资主体 →
切开; - 含特许经营期内运营并向使用者收费或可行性缺口补助、期满移交,且以运营收益回收投资 → 引擎重新定性(特许/PPP),不得用本技能把“建成即移交、政府纯付费回购”改成特许经营外观;
- 商业代建、资本代建、股权代建或“代建+贷款配资” → 对应委托合同代建原子,不得用本技能吞并;
- 编制勘察报告 →
建设工程勘察合同·审查;出施工图 →建设工程设计合同·审查;监理 →建设工程监理合同·审查;咨询混签 →建设工程咨询服务合同·审查或引擎; - 联合体成员之间的内部分工文本 →
联合体协议·审查; - 无可读文本、本类型条件已谈妥、要出己方稿 →
BT合同·起草; - 已签只问融资到位日、移交日、回购款哪天催 → 本套导航的履约步骤;
- 已成争(催告回购、确认无效、优先受偿诉讼、隐性债务认定、立案仲裁)→
或或或。
挂靠、违法分包、必须招标未招、政府投资垫资、机关违规担保、把工程建设或融资包装成政府购买服务、把建成即移交包装成特许经营:只出告知,不改写成可履行结构。用户坚持“改到能签/先建后补招/机关出担保函就能放款”:整体停止。
本类型硬闸
执行时必须同时守住。每闸必须能落到修改句或明确停笔,不得用施工进度款、代建管理费或 DBO 运营考核替换。
-
建设—移交—回购
本类型成立必须同时读出三条链:投资人融资建设;竣工验收合格后签署《移交确认书》并转移占有/权属;回购价款自移交确认之日起算并按附件计划分期支付。回购价分账为建安工程费、融资利息、投资回报,三者不得混写成“工程款”。缺移交确认书、缺回购起算日、建设期仍按月进度付款且无融资义务:按核心给付负触发施工或总承包原子,不得硬套回购结构。
修改句方向:标题改为“建设工程 BT 投资建设合同”或“项目投融资建设移交协议”;标的写融资、建设、移交、回购全过程;增列附件《移交标准及清单》《回购款支付计划表》《融资计划书》;移交确认书签署日=回购起算日。 -
特许 / 采购程序
BT 含施工,落入依法必须招标范围的,须履行投融资与施工招标程序(可合一,但不得以“投资人直接指定”规避施工招标)。不得把工程建设或融资行为写成政府购买服务(财政部令第 102 号第 10 条明确排除货物、工程、工程与服务打包、融资行为)。不得把“建成即移交、政府纯付费回购”包装成基础设施特许经营:2024 年《基础设施和公用事业特许经营管理办法》第 7 条禁止在建设工程完成后直接将项目移交政府,或通过提前终止逃避运营义务;第 4 条将特许经营限定为基于使用者付费的合作。2015 年第 25 号令已失效。
修改句方向:鉴于条款锁定立项批复、招标文件、中标通知书;生效条件写明依法必须招标的已完成招标且合同与中标文件一致;删除“以政府购买服务预算安排支付回购款”“本合同即为特许经营协议、建成即移交”。未招标或先定后招:只告知,不改成倒签可履行。 -
与 DBO
DBO合同·审查/ 政府代建切开切开
DBO:业主融资,承包人设计+建造+长期运营,回收靠运营服务费或考核付费,不是移交后回购投资本息。政府代建:政府是投资主体并支付代建管理费,代建人不承担项目融资,也不得把“全额垫资+分期回购”改成代建外观。本技能禁止输出运营绩效考核表、使用者付费调价公式、代建管理费费率或“三方使用人接收”作为主路径,禁止打开其 method。
修改句方向:删除运营期分成、可用性付费绑定运营、代建管理费;恢复融资义务、移交确认书和回购计划。来稿主给付是运营或代建管理:负触发对应原子。
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 132 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A b4ceebd9f81f
BT合同·审查 is a skill published in the GitHub repository Lawyeah-Tech/lawyeah (7 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 4,190 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
cn-law-hub
A Chinese-language research tool for finding and checking official Chinese laws, regulations, treaties, and individual legal provisions.
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305
Für AGB Begriff Vorformuliert 305: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305.
agb-rechtswahl-schweizer-recht-rom-i
Für AGB Rechtswahl Schweizer Recht Rom I: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: agb-rechtswahl-schweizer-recht-rom-i.