Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lazysheep-z/apdr-product-design-runtime --skill design-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lazysheep-z/apdr-product-design-runtimeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lazysheep-z/apdr-product-design-runtime/design-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lazysheep-z/apdr-product-design-runtime/design-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lazysheep-z/apdr-product-design-runtime/design-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lazysheep-z/apdr-product-design-runtime/design-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lazysheep-z/apdr-product-design-runtime/design-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00536 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00268 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
apdr-design-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 54 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Design Reviewer (APDR)
Stage: design_review. Requires: UIDesignSpec + Wireframes approved.
External references
- dequelabs/axe-core 7k★ -- accessibility testing engine, WCAG compliance checks
- radix-ui/primitives 19k★ -- accessible component patterns reference
Workflow
-
get_latest_artifact -- UIDesignSpec, Wireframes
-
Run 4 checks and write results into DesignReviewReport:
a) Token consistency check
- Verify every Wireframe region has a corresponding DesignToken category
- Check color tokens: ensure sufficient palette for all UI states
- Check spacing tokens: verify scale covers all layout gaps
b) Component coverage check
- Map every IA node / wireframe region to a component in UIDesignSpec
- Flag any wireframe page that lacks a component mapping
- List component variants (default, hover, active, disabled, error)
c) Responsive check
- Verify token set includes mobile (320px), tablet (768px), desktop (1024px+)
- Flag any token that only works at one breakpoint
- Reference radix-ui/primitives for responsive component patterns
d) Accessibility check
- Verify color contrast ratios (WCAG AA: 4.5:1 text, 3:1 large)
- Check focus indicator tokens exist
- Reference axe-core patterns for keyboard navigation
- Verify semantic HTML structure in wireframe pages
-
Collect issues: severity (critical/major/minor), item, recommendation
-
Set passed = true only if no critical or major issues remain
-
Write artifact DesignReviewReport
Do not
- Advance to codegen before DesignReviewReport.passed is true
- Approve if critical accessibility issues exist
- Flag cosmetic preferences as issues -- only structural quality
References
- dequelabs/axe-core 7k★ -- WCAG compliance engine
- radix-ui/primitives 19k★ -- accessible component library
- tldraw/tldraw 48k★ -- visual diagramming reference
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 54 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 8f757cd0d2ae
apdr-design-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository lazysheep-z/apdr-product-design-runtime (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 536 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
chakra-ui-builder
Build responsive, accessible UI components and layouts using Chakra UI v3, install or configure Chakra UI in new and existing projects, and design scalable themes using tokens, semantic tokens, recipes, and slot recipes. Use this skill whenever a user asks to build, create, or generate any UI component, page, form…
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ultragoal with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
frontend-ui-dark-ts
Build dark-themed React applications using Tailwind CSS with custom theming, glassmorphism effects, and Framer Motion animations. Use when creating dashboards, admin panels, or data-rich interfaces with a refined dark aesthetic.
reveal-hover-effect
Build cursor-following spotlight reveals that expose a second aligned image through a soft radial mask. Use for hover-to-color, before-and-after, x-ray, material, texture, product-detail, and illustrated hero effects where a desaturated or embossed base image should remain visible while another treatment follows an…
frontend-visual-qa
Audits already-rendered web, landing-page, HTML deck/slide, browser tool/game, dashboard/admin, design-system, and desktop UIs using real-browser or native-app journeys, inspected screenshots, DOM geometry, responsive or projection viewports, and a bundled Playwright sweep. Use after UI implementation to find…
prototype-web
A clickable, high-fidelity web product prototype with navigation, a hero section, feature cards, steps, social proof, and optional pricing. It is designed to resemble a finished landing page while remaining a prototype.