Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add leadbay/mcp --skill leadbay_plan_tour_in_citygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/leadbay/mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leadbay/mcp/leadbay_plan_tour_in_city)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leadbay/mcp/leadbay_plan_tour_in_city"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leadbay/mcp/leadbay_plan_tour_in_city/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leadbay/mcp/leadbay_plan_tour_in_city"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leadbay/mcp/leadbay_plan_tour_in_city.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00118 | $0.03067 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.01533 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00613 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00307 |
Grade A, and why
leadbay_plan_tour_in_city scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Plan a field sales tour for me in <City or region the user is visiting (e.g. 'Limoges', 'Bay Area'). Used as the geo filter for both Monitor and Discover lookups. A country is not a city: this workspace already covers exactly one country, and a country name here silently fences the tour to a same-named village. Do NOT omit the argument to recover — a city-less tour returns arbitrary leads from across the whole workspace, which is not an itinerary. Ask which city or region the visit is to. If not provided in the user's most recent message, ask once before proceeding.><if the user supplied this argument, render the short parenthetical or inline clause derived from it; otherwise empty. Source: When the visit is (e.g. 'May 24', 'next Thursday'). Surfaced in the outreach drafts as 'I'll be in on '.>.
GATE — DEFER TO TOOL RENDERING. When you call a Leadbay composite that ships its own RENDERING block (every composite in 0.9.0+ does), render the response using that block's recipe verbatim — score bars, glyph palette, column order, hide-list, link priorities, all of it. Do NOT substitute prose, a numbered list, or a different column structure even when an orchestrating prompt's body suggests alternate framing. Prompt-specific commentary (motivational nudges, summaries, next-action recommendations) belongs ABOVE or BELOW the canonical table, never in place of it.
If the prompt's body and the tool's RENDERING appear to conflict, the tool's RENDERING wins for the structural layout; the prompt's voice wins for the commentary that surrounds it.
PHASE 1 — CLARIFY SCOPE FIRST (ask before building)
Before calling leadbay_tour_plan, ask me what the tour should cover — a field tour is high-intent and the scope changes what lands on the map. Use your host's interactive question widget (ask_user_input_v0 in Claude chat — {questions:[{question, type:"single_select", options:[…]}]}; or AskUserQuestion in cowork / Claude Code — {questions:[{question, header, multiSelect, options:[{label, description}]}]}). Ask at most 2 short tap-to-answer questions:
- Who to include? — options: "Mix — known accounts + fresh prospects" (default), "Only my known accounts (follow-ups)", "Only fresh new prospects".
- Enrich contacts that have no phone/email? — options: "Yes, enrich the top stops", "No, just plan the tour".
Skip a question only if I already answered it in my request (e.g. "plan a tour of just my new leads in NYC" → who-to-include is already "only new"; don't re-ask). If I gave the full scope up front, skip PHASE 1 entirely and go to PHASE 2.
Map my answers to the leadbay_tour_plan call:
- Mix → defaults (
followups_count: 6, discover_count: 6). - Only known accounts →
discover_count: 0. - Only new prospects →
followups_count: 0. - Enrich = yes → after the tour is planned (PHASE 2), call
leadbay_enrich_titles/leadbay_prepare_outreach(enrich:true)on the top stops that have norecommended_contactchannel, before drafting outreach.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 112 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A 61cd92e82d30
leadbay_plan_tour_in_city is a skill published in the GitHub repository leadbay/mcp (0 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 3,067 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…