strategy-os: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/gap-enforcing-decisions/SKILL.md

gap-enforcing-decisions is a skill for Claude Code from LeanOS-Technologies/strategy-os. It costs 50 tokens per session (2,238 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A decision-checking process for a strategy register: a shared record of assumptions, evidence, proposals, and open questions. It applies ten rules to decide what is ready, blocked, or next in line.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review gap analyses and adversarial findings, change confidence or support levels when evidence warrants it, set readiness gates, create execution tasks, and escalate blockers.
Why use it?
It prevents teams from moving ahead while important evidence or earlier analysis is missing. It also records why a decision was made and which issue should be handled first.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is LeanOS-Technologies/strategy-os's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on strategy-os itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything strategy-os configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to LeanOS-Technologies/strategy-os. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LeanOS-Technologies/strategy-os/main/.claude/skills/gap-enforcing-decisions/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeanOS-Technologies/strategy-os

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gap-enforcing-decisions

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leanos-technologies/strategy-os/gap-enforcing-decisions.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leanos-technologies/strategy-os/gap-enforcing-decisions)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leanos-technologies/strategy-os/gap-enforcing-decisions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leanos-technologies/strategy-os/gap-enforcing-decisions.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 50 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,238 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00050 $0.02238
Opus 5 $0.00025 $0.01119
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00448
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00224

Measured 6d ago against content hash f0d764cafe4c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gap-enforcing-decisions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/gap-enforcing-decisions/SKILL.md · 248 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 248 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Decision Enforcement

Apply the mandatory decision rules to the gap ledger and destruction outcomes. Produce state changes, readiness gate values, execution queue entries, and governor escalations.

Every rule must be evaluated. No rule may be skipped. Every block must have explicit rationale.


Process

Step 1: Collect Inputs [S]

Gather from prior skill outputs and register state:

  1. Gap Ledger (scored and ranked gap records from gap-computing-ledger).
  2. Destruction Log (outcomes from gap-running-destruction).
  3. Current confidence states for all hypotheses.
  4. Current support states for all proposals.
  5. Decision deadlines and their statuses.
  6. Active blockers.
  7. Any governor responses from execution/queue/.

Gate: inputs_collected: bool -- gap ledger and destruction log both available. If either is missing, halt: "Cannot enforce decisions without gap computation and destruction pass."

  • Pass: Step 2.
  • Fail: halt. Report which input is missing.

Step 2: Apply Priority Rule [S]

Rule: Always work on the gap with the highest (gap score x blast radius).

  1. Read the ranked gap list from gap-computing-ledger.
  2. Confirm the #1 gap is the current work priority.
  3. If the current execution queue contains tasks not aligned with the top gap, flag them.

Gate: priority_confirmed: bool -- top gap identified, priority stated.

  • Pass: Step 3.
  • Fail: re-rank gaps.

Step 3: Apply Execution Rule [R]

Rule: A task is valid only if it reduces a top-3 open gap and produces T1 or T2 evidence.

For each proposed or active task:

Check Pass Fail
Targets a top-3 gap? Valid Reject: "does not reduce a top-3 gap"
Produces T1 or T2 evidence? Valid Reject: "does not produce qualifying evidence"

List valid tasks and rejected tasks with rejection reason.

Gate: execution_filtered: bool -- every task evaluated. Invalid tasks rejected with reason.

  • Pass: Step 4.
  • Fail: re-evaluate tasks against current top-3 gaps.

Read the full file on GitHub · 248 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 248 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A f0d764cafe4c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gap-enforcing-decisions is a skill published in the GitHub repository LeanOS-Technologies/strategy-os (37 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 2,238 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

llm-app-patterns

Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications. Covers RAG pipelines, agent architectures, prompt IDEs, and LLMOps monitoring. Use when designing AI applications, implementing RAG, building agents, or setting up LLM observability.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 54 tokens

email-sequence

When the user wants to create or optimize an email sequence, drip campaign, automated email flow, or lifecycle email program. Also use when the user mentions "email sequence," "drip campaign," "nurture sequence," "onboarding emails," "welcome sequence," "re-engagement emails," "email automation," or "lifecycle…

davila7/claude-code-templates · 84 tokens

qa-test-planner

Generate comprehensive test plans, manual test cases, regression test suites, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 34 tokens

gepetto

Creates detailed, sectionized implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review. Use when planning features that need thorough pre-implementation analysis.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 35 tokens

guidance

Control LLM output with regex and grammars, guarantee valid JSON/XML/code generation, enforce structured formats, and build multi-step workflows with Guidance - Microsoft Research's constrained generation framework.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 38 tokens

content-research-writer

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 49 tokens