Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lebsral/DSPy-Programming-not-prompting-LMs-skills --skill ai-testing-safetygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lebsral/DSPy-Programming-not-prompting-LMs-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lebsral/dspy-programming-not-prompting-lms-skills/ai-testing-safety)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lebsral/dspy-programming-not-prompting-lms-skills/ai-testing-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lebsral/dspy-programming-not-prompting-lms-skills/ai-testing-safety/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lebsral/dspy-programming-not-prompting-lms-skills/ai-testing-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lebsral/dspy-programming-not-prompting-lms-skills/ai-testing-safety.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00167 | $0.02979 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00084 | $0.01489 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00596 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00298 |
Grade A, and why
ai-testing-safety scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 265 lines · 167 tokens per session scan A f2b28eccc03d
ai-testing-safety is a skill published in the GitHub repository lebsral/DSPy-Programming-not-prompting-LMs-skills (11 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 167 tokens to every session and 2,979 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
improve-code-quality
Guided journey from a working-but-untested vibe-coded prototype to a production-ready product with tests, clean structure, a business-rules boundary, and resilience at scale. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-code, refactoring-patterns, software-design-philosophy…
working-with-legacy-code
Safely change and test untested codebases using Feathers' "Working Effectively with Legacy Code". Use when the user mentions "legacy code", "no tests", "untested codebase", "how do I test this", "seams", "characterization tests", "golden master", "sprout method", "afraid to change this code", "monster method"…
lov-fix-until-no-error
A verification-focused debugging workflow that repeatedly runs specified checks, fixes the highest-priority failure, and stops when the checks pass or a genuine external blockage remains.
fec-component-testing
A guide for writing and reviewing front-end unit, component, and lightweight integration tests. These tests check small pieces of code and UI behavior without running a full browser journey.
test-audit
Audit test suites for T1-T4 violations using AST analysis, mock detection, and multi-stage synthesis. Invoke when user asks to audit tests, check test quality, find mock violations, review test effectiveness, or inspect test suites for over-mocking. Triggers automatic rewrites when quality gates fail.
mock-detection
Deep mock appropriateness analysis for Test Audit pipeline.