Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/codeownershipnpx skills add LedgerHQ/ledger-live --skill codeownershipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LedgerHQ/ledger-liveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/codeownership)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/codeownership"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/codeownership.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00530 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00265 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
codeownership scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Codeownership
Why
- To reduce cross-team review bottlenecks
What
- Make ownership of team specific directories clear
- Organise some directories into team-specific sub-directories
- Maintain CODEOWNERS files when team specific directories are added or removed
- Split monolithic files or folders that have been identified as being touched by too many teams
Resolving ownership for a list of files
Use resolve-codeowners.js to annotate any list of files with their CODEOWNERS team — handy when splitting a large PR by team owner. The script finds ignore in the pnpm virtual store automatically (no extra install).
# From a git diff
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 | node .agents/skills/codeownership/resolve-codeowners.js
# Explicit file list
node .agents/skills/codeownership/resolve-codeowners.js apps/ledger-live-desktop/src/foo.ts libs/env/src/bar.ts
# Override CODEOWNERS location
node .agents/skills/codeownership/resolve-codeowners.js --codeowners /path/to/CODEOWNERS <files...>
Output format (same columns as CODEOWNERS, but resolved to actual files):
apps/ledger-live-desktop/src/main/index.ts @ledgerhq/platform
apps/ledger-live-desktop/src/renderer/foo.ts @ledgerhq/wallet-xp
.github/workflows/e2e.yml @ledgerhq/wallet-ci @ledgerhq/qaa
random/unknown/file.xyz (no owner)
Semantics: last-rule-wins; ownerless entries appear as (no owner).
Target
Splitting a monolithic file
- Split
[foo].tsinto[foo]/team-[name]/*.ts
Maintaining team specific directories
Example
/shared/feature-flags/src/flags/ contains team-coin-integration, team-engagement, team-live-devices, etc.
CODEOWNERS defines the owner for each of these:
**/team-coin-integration/ @ledgerhq/coin-integration
**/team-engagement/ @ledgerhq/engagement
**/team-live-devices/ @ledgerhq/live-devices
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 63 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 4b1d508f6408
codeownership is a skill published in the GitHub repository LedgerHQ/ledger-live (615 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 530 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…