Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to LedgerHQ/ledger-live. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LedgerHQ/ledger-live/develop/.agents/skills/get-pr-comments/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LedgerHQ/ledger-liveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/get-pr-comments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/get-pr-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/get-pr-comments/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/get-pr-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/get-pr-comments.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00107 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00043 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
get-pr-comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to get-pr-comments — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Get PR comments
Trigger
Need a concise, actionable summary of feedback on the active pull request.
Workflow
- Resolve the active PR for the current branch.
- Fetch review comments and discussion comments.
- Group feedback by severity and actionability.
- Return a concise action list.
Output
- Grouped feedback summary
- Action list ordered by priority
- Open questions that still need clarification
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 23 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 8bf292736cab
get-pr-comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository LedgerHQ/ledger-live (624 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 107 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to get-pr-comments, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
connector-sdk-submit
Prepare a Community Connector or Fivetran Connector SDK example for a first pull request by applying the target repository's GitHub review instructions, sanitizing configuration.json, and running Black and Flake8.
arch-review-{group}
Architecture review through the {title} lenses: {keywords}. For a change in this area, or as one leg of arch-review-full.