Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to LedgerHQ/ledger-live. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LedgerHQ/ledger-live/develop/.agents/skills/pre-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LedgerHQ/ledger-liveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/pre-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/pre-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/pre-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/pre-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ledgerhq/ledger-live/pre-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00006 | $0.00389 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
pre-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Pre-Review
Deep code review
Process
-
Run
git diff develop...HEADto get the full diff. -
Launch 5
code-revieweragents in parallel, each with a different focus:- A — Architecture & MVVM compliance
- B — Correctness (edge cases, null handling, error states)
- C — Code quality & conventions (Lumen UI, TypeScript, naming, new deps). Reject new
.pnpmfile.cjshooks andpnpm.packageExtensions(skillpnpm-resolution). - D — General review — DRY, KISS, missing tests, anything that would slow down a reviewer or cause future regressions
- E — Security: invoke the
detect-data-leaksskill for PII; check for auth bypass, injection, SSRF, crypto misuse; scan the diff for hardcoded secrets, tokens, API keys, or private keys.
Each agent prompt: "Review the diff vs develop. Focus on [FOCUS]. Return findings with file:line, severity (🔴 Critical / 🟡 Suggestion / 🟢 Nice to have), and suggested fix."
-
Merge + deduplicate findings. Present grouped by severity:
🔴 Critical — path/to/file.ts:42 — issue → fix 🟡 Suggestion — ... 🟢 Nice to have — ... Summary: X critical, Y suggestions, Z nice-to-haves -
Ask the user which items to fix: "all criticals", "all", "#1,#2, #3", or "skip" →
/create-pr
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 223425f68029
- 2mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A c9dd8d35eb3b
pre-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository LedgerHQ/ledger-live (624 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 389 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
connector-sdk-submit
Prepare a Community Connector or Fivetran Connector SDK example for a first pull request by applying the target repository's GitHub review instructions, sanitizing configuration.json, and running Black and Flake8.
arch-review-{group}
Architecture review through the {title} lenses: {keywords}. For a change in this area, or as one leg of arch-review-full.