Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add leecyno1/boutique-skills --skill content-brief-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/leecyno1/boutique-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leecyno1/boutique-skills/content-brief-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leecyno1/boutique-skills/content-brief-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leecyno1/boutique-skills/content-brief-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leecyno1/boutique-skills/content-brief-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leecyno1/boutique-skills/content-brief-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.01578 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00789 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00316 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00158 |
Grade A, and why
content-brief-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 165 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Content Brief Builder
目标
将原始主题输入转化为可复用、可跨媒介消费的 Content Brief。
输入
- Topic Intake Record
- 可选的原始采集记录集合
- 可选的账号定位 / 内容目标
- 可选的人工补充说明
工作流
- 若输入来自自动采集,先进行聚类、归并、去重。
- 若输入来自人工命题,先整理主题、意图、受众、内容目标。
- 统一提炼:主题定义、核心判断、核心冲突、角度候选、风险边界。
- 动态风险评估(已实现):
- 分析内容类型敏感性(教育/财务/医疗等 +20分)
- 评估目标受众脆弱性(未成年人/特殊群体 +15分)
- 检查媒介平台政策限制(+10分)
- 识别声明中的绝对化表述(过度承诺/虚假宣传 +15分)
- 评估数据证据质量(缺少证据/过时数据 +10分)
- 生成动态
risk_notes和改进建议
- 动态计算
production_value_score(新增,使用scoring_algorithm.py):- 基础分:50 分
- 角度数量奖励:每个角度 +10 分(最多 +30)
- 媒介数量奖励:每个媒介 +5 分(最多 +25)
- 复杂度奖励:low +0, medium +10, high +15
- 风险惩罚:low -0, medium -5, high -15
- 目标受众奖励:每个受众 +3 分(最多 +15)
- 最终评分范围:0-100
- 给出推荐媒介类型:文章、视频、图文或混合。
- 初始化
source_summary(已实现)- 自动采集模式:从 intake_refs 提取来源分布
- 人工命题模式:初始化为
{ "manual_input": 1 }+ 生成 manual_ref_id
- 生成 Content Brief,并建议写入飞书文档保存为长期资产。
输出契约
Brief SummaryAngle CandidatesRecommended AngleProduction Value Score(动态计算,0-100)Recommended MediaRisk Assessment(包含 risk_notes 和改进建议)Content Brief(含完整的 source_summary)Next Recommended Step
生产价值评分算法
评分公式
最终评分 = 基础分 + 角度奖励 + 媒介奖励 + 复杂度奖励 + 受众奖励 - 风险惩罚
评分组件详解
| 组件 | 基础值 | 规则 | 最大值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 基础分 | 50 | 固定 | 50 |
| 角度奖励 | - | 每个角度 +10 | +30 |
| 媒介奖励 | - | 每个媒介 +5 | +25 |
| 复杂度奖励 | - | low +0, medium +10, high +15 | +15 |
| 受众奖励 | - | 每个受众 +3 | +15 |
| 风险惩罚 | - | low -0, medium -5, high -15 | -15 |
评分示例
低复杂度内容(1 角度,1 媒介,低风险,1 受众)
50 + 10 + 5 + 0 + 3 - 0 = 68/100
高复杂度内容(3 角度,3 媒介,高风险,3 受众)
50 + 30 + 15 + 15 + 9 - 15 = 104 → 100/100(截断)
source_summary 初始化规则
自动采集模式(source_mode: 'auto')
source_summary:
source_distribution:
xhs: 2 # 来自小红书的采集数
weibo: 1 # 来自微博的采集数
...
representative_sources:
- "https://www.xiaohongshu.com/explore/..."
- "https://weibo.com/..."
人工命题模式(source_mode: 'manual')
source_summary:
source_distribution:
manual_input: 1
representative_sources:
- "manual_topic_20260315_001" # 格式:manual_topic_YYYYMMDD_XXX
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- ACCEPTANCE_CHECKLIST.md 5.4 KB
- ACCEPTANCE_REPORT.md 8.0 KB
- DELIVERY_SUMMARY.md 4.5 KB
- GUIDE.md 1017 B
- integration_example.py 9.3 KB runs code
- manual_source_summary_init.py 8.3 KB runs code
- README.md 7.0 KB
- references/usage-notes.md 1.1 KB
- risk_assessment_algorithm.py 11 KB runs code
- scoring_algorithm.py 5.8 KB runs code
- SCORING_TEST_REPORT.md 7.4 KB
- TEST_REPORT.md 5.8 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 165 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 601b3cc56fe7
content-brief-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository leecyno1/boutique-skills (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,578 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…