Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LegalQuants/lq-ai --skill vendor-privacy-policy-first-passgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LegalQuants/lq-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/legalquants/lq-ai/vendor-privacy-policy-first-pass)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/legalquants/lq-ai/vendor-privacy-policy-first-pass"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/legalquants/lq-ai/vendor-privacy-policy-first-pass/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/legalquants/lq-ai/vendor-privacy-policy-first-pass"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/legalquants/lq-ai/vendor-privacy-policy-first-pass.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00102 | $0.03506 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.01753 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00701 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00351 |
Grade A, and why
vendor-privacy-policy-first-pass scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- vendor-privacy-policy-first-pass — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 215 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Vendor Privacy Policy First Pass
Conduct a fast triage assessment of a vendor's privacy policy to help the user decide whether deeper diligence is warranted before sharing data with the vendor. The output is a structured summary plus red-flag identification, not a full privacy assessment.
This skill is calibrated for the in-house counsel use case: a vendor has been proposed, the user has limited time, and the question is "does this policy contain anything that would change our decision to proceed, or does it look standard enough that we can move to DPA negotiation and security review?"
When this skill applies
Apply when the user provides a vendor's privacy policy (or what is presented as one) and asks for a quick assessment. Common triggers:
- Vendor proposed during procurement; quick read needed before deeper review.
- Vendor's published policy used as a baseline for DPA negotiation (the policy describes what the vendor says it does; the DPA captures what the vendor commits to do).
- Periodic re-review of an existing vendor's updated privacy policy.
- Pre-meeting prep before a vendor security/privacy review call.
Do not apply when:
- The user wants a full privacy assessment. This skill is a first pass; full assessments are out of scope. Recommend a comprehensive privacy assessment performed by qualified privacy counsel, especially for high-sensitivity data flows.
- The user wants DPA review. Use DPA Checklist Review for that. The privacy policy is the vendor's public representation; the DPA is the contractual commitment. They serve different purposes and warrant different reviews.
- The user wants to evaluate the vendor's actual security practices. Privacy policies describe data practices, not security architecture. Security questionnaires, SOC 2 Type II reports, and penetration test summaries are the appropriate inputs for security review.
- The document is something other than a privacy policy (cookie policy alone; terms of service; security exhibit; AUP). Privacy policies have a recognizable structure (data collection, use, sharing, retention, rights, contact). If the document doesn't have these elements, it isn't a privacy policy.
- The user wants assistance drafting a privacy policy. Out of scope; recommend privacy counsel and a policy template appropriate to the user's jurisdiction and data practices.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 215 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A f0c1d380fd60
vendor-privacy-policy-first-pass is a skill published in the GitHub repository LegalQuants/lq-ai (136 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 3,506 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
external-purchases
US web checkout via the StoreKit External Purchase Link entitlement — currently 0% Apple commission (litigation ongoing), how to ship it safely, and how to architect for a commission flip so a future ruling is a config change, not a rewrite. Use when adding external purchase links, weighing web checkout vs IAP, or…