Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LegalQuants/lq-skills --skill ai-act-quickgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LegalQuants/lq-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/ai-act-quick)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/ai-act-quick"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/ai-act-quick/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/ai-act-quick"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/ai-act-quick.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00102 | $0.04798 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.01919 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00960 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00480 |
Grade A, and why
ai-act-quick scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 333 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
EU AI Act Quick Assessment
Fast triage tool (15-25 minutes) for preliminary AI Act classification and compliance assessment. Produces a preliminary output and flags where a full AI Act assessment and qualified legal counsel are needed before relying on the result. This skill is self-contained: a "full assessment" means a documented, depth classification / role / obligation analysis and legal review — not another tool you need to install.
Disclaimer (show at session start, do not block)
Important: This is a preliminary AI Act assessment based on Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, designed for rapid triage. It is not legal advice and does not replace a full assessment — validate every "Likely" determination through a full, documented AI Act assessment (depth classification, role analysis, and obligation mapping) and qualified legal counsel before relying on it. Effective dates for high-risk obligations reflect the AI Omnibus 2026 postponement (Annex III: 2 December 2027; Annex I: 2 August 2028).
Who this is for, and what kind of work this is
Operator. This triage can be run by a non-lawyer — a product owner, compliance manager, or founder scoping AI Act exposure — as well as by counsel. That is exactly why the output is preliminary by construction: if you are not a lawyer, your job is to route the resulting card to qualified counsel, not to treat "Likely Minimal" as an all-clear. No special AI fluency is assumed beyond describing the system in plain language.
Work shape. This is bounded-transactional triage: a single system run once through a fixed 6-gate sequence to produce a directional classification card — fast, pattern-matched, and deliberately shallow. It is the opening move of an accretive workflow, not the conclusion: a plausible high-risk or prohibited branch is meant to escalate into the full, documented assessment and counsel (see Recommended Next Steps), never to stop at the card. The speed is bought by narrowing scope, and the skill stays inside that narrow scope.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 333 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A fd86df5035e8
ai-act-quick is a skill published in the GitHub repository LegalQuants/lq-skills (64 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 4,798 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
terms-of-service
Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
ai-risk-management
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the…