Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LegalQuants/lq-skills --skill uk-witness-statement-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LegalQuants/lq-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/uk-witness-statement-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/uk-witness-statement-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/uk-witness-statement-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/uk-witness-statement-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/legalquants/lq-skills/uk-witness-statement-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.01485 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00594 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00297 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00148 |
Grade A, and why
uk-witness-statement-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 149 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
uk-witness-statement-review
When to Use
- A user has a draft witness statement for England and Wales civil proceedings.
- The statement needs checking against documents, chronology, pleadings, or disclosure.
- The user wants issues flagged before signing, service, exchange, or filing.
- The draft may contain argument, speculation, hearsay, unsupported recollection, or inconsistent dates.
This skill is a review workflow. It does not certify truth, settle admissibility, or replace solicitor/counsel sign-off.
Audience and Work Shape
Audience: England and Wales litigation lawyers, pupils/trainees, and paralegals reviewing witness evidence under supervision before service or filing.
Work shape: pattern-matched review with accretive judgment. The skill classifies paragraph types, flags support/rule issues, and prepares questions for the responsible lawyer/witness; it does not certify the evidence.
Legal Failure Modes
- Legal support, not legal advice: the review flags drafting, evidential, and procedural issues; it does not certify truth, admissibility, or compliance.
- Privilege/confidentiality: witness drafts, exhibits, and reviewer comments may be privileged or confidential. Use approved environments and keep outputs within the privilege group unless a responsible lawyer approves circulation.
- Accountability: the witness owns the truth of the evidence, and the responsible lawyer owns service, filing, and strategic use.
Access Modes
This skill works in three modes:
- Live source mode - use browser, web search, MCP, API, or other configured access to retrieve public rules, orders, filings, or source documents.
- User-supplied source mode - use the draft statement plus uploaded or pasted exhibits, pleadings, correspondence, chronology, disclosure, prior statements, rules, or orders supplied by the user.
- No-source mode - review the statement's internal drafting issues and produce a source-request checklist, but do not mark factual assertions as supported.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 149 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 6797c07e59c9
uk-witness-statement-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository LegalQuants/lq-skills (64 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 1,485 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Brief Section Drafter
Use when drafting a single section of a litigation brief — such as a statement of facts, argument section, standard of review, or conclusion — that is cited to the record, consistent with the case theory, and fully flagged for attorney verification before filing.
Demand Letter
Use when drafting a demand letter for attorney review — running a structured intake, a pre-draft risk gate, and a draft with every legal conclusion, damages figure, and deadline flagged for attorney confirmation before sending.
Motion Opposition Drafter
Use when organizing and drafting a DRAFT opposition or response brief to a pending motion — deconstructing the movant's arguments into a point-by-point response outline, mapping the movant's cited authorities to verification placeholders, and assembling a source-cited opposition draft for attorney review before filing.
mqc-chronicle-master
A document-preparation workflow that turns a collection of legal materials into a dated case timeline. It copies facts from the source, records dates, parties, page references, and conflicts, and produces Word, Excel, and a short visual version.
mqc-trial-confrontation-master
A legal case-preparation workflow that turns case materials into a map of the parties' claims, the court's checks, and the opposing arguments. It also produces a structured analysis table, with legal and evidence confidence labels and sources for its reasoning.
cookie-consent-policy
Drafts publication-ready cookie policies, banner copy, and consent-flow language under GDPR/ePrivacy, CCPA/CPRA, and major U.S. state privacy laws. Converts a verified cookie inventory into enforceable policy sections with lawful-basis mapping, granular opt-in controls, withdrawal mechanics, and user-rights handling.…