Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to legann/repovine. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/legann/repovine/main/.agents/skills/repovine-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/legann/repovineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/legann/repovine/repovine-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/legann/repovine/repovine-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/legann/repovine/repovine-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/legann/repovine/repovine-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/legann/repovine/repovine-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.02360 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.01180 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00472 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00236 |
Grade A, and why
repovine-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 192 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review and Audit
Use this skill when the user asks for a review, merge-readiness check, implementation validation, architecture audit, refactoring triage, or security-sensitive boundary audit. This is a read-only workflow: do not edit files, update snapshots, write annotations, or change the workspace.
Use the managed repovine-code-reviewer agent for read-only implementation/diff reviews. Use the managed repovine-architecture-auditor agent for architecture smells, boundaries, frontend state/effect problems, event-driven boundaries, and security-sensitive risks. The main agent uses this skill to gather the packet, choose the repovine checks, delegate when useful, and format the verdict.
Inputs to gather
- Assignment/task, acceptance criteria, and contracts.
- Diff base, changed files, and touched graph nodes.
- Implementation result if available:
AgentRunResult, tests run, compliance flags, contextPack/contextSessionId. - Any known baseline failures, flaky tests, unavailable env/resources, or CI evidence.
If the diff base or task is missing and cannot be inferred safely, ask a short clarification before reviewing.
Choose the Review Path
| User asks for | Use |
|---|---|
| Code review, diff review, merge readiness, acceptance validation | repovine-code-reviewer or local read-only review |
| Architecture smells, duplication, low cohesion, god modules | repovine-architecture-auditor with analyze_architecture |
| Package/domain boundaries or service wrappers | analyze_architecture + analyze_dependencies |
| Frontend state, effects, routes, design-system leakage, client policy | analyze_architecture with frontend categories and includeComponentEntrypoints: true when needed |
| Event-driven or runtime/resource boundaries | trace_flow + analyze_architecture |
| Security-sensitive boundaries | analyze_architecture security categories + get_config_surface |
| Missing annotation memory or unclear ownership | get_annotation_status + analyze_architecture({ "categories": ["unclear-architecture", "annotation-risk"] }) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 192 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 40ef36fde535
repovine-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository legann/repovine (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 2,360 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…