Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/leifericf/agentic-sdk/advance-plannpx skills add leifericf/agentic-sdk --skill advance-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/leifericf/agentic-sdkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leifericf/agentic-sdk/advance-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leifericf/agentic-sdk/advance-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leifericf/agentic-sdk/advance-plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01830 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00915 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00366 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00183 |
Grade A, and why
advance-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
advance-plan
Role: the campaign driver. Takes a named chunk of an approved plan, has a planner decompose it into a forward-only DAG of phases, secures one approval, then walks the DAG dispatching one change-runner per phase, unattended.
Prerequisites
An approved feature plan from plan-system (a planning/tasks/plan-*.md
file), or a named chunk the maintainer points at. ~/.agentic-sdk/<project>/project.edn
exists with :lanes and :spine set.
Procedure
Read skills/shared/references/orchestration.md before driving. Its
laws bind this skill: context is the budget, the work flows forward-only
as a DAG, the stack stays linear on the tip, and agents decide and
record rather than stall.
- Check for a resume. If
~/.agentic-sdk/<project>/runs/<slug>/checkpoint.ednexists for this chunk, resume: read it and the plan at~/.agentic-sdk/<project>/runs/<slug>/plan.edn, skip landed phases, re-dispatch any in-flight phase, continue the open ones. Resume from the checkpoint and plan, not from history. - Plan up front, in a sub-agent. Dispatch one planner agent running
plan-work. Its prompt is self-contained: the named chunk (or "next
runnable work") and a pointer to the feature plan. The planner reads
what is already landed (the commit log, the modules and tests that
exist), picks the chunk in dependency order, and decomposes it into a
forward-only DAG of phases and tasks. For each task it names the
planned commit and the specialist that will execute it (a writer with
the relevant write- recipe or write-tests, a reviewer, and so
on). It tags each phase with a risk tier that sets the model and
effort: HIGH-RADIUS (a native edge between languages, a query or
codegen path, a security seam, a cross-module or wire-format change)
runs at the full tier; MECHANICAL (a test-only phase, a scaffold, a
single-module pure refactor) runs at a cheaper model and lower
effort. Each phase carries its own tests, its check-security pass
where untrusted input is involved, and its verification lanes in its
definition of done. The planner writes the full plan to the
gitignored
~/.agentic-sdk/<project>/runs/<slug>/plan.ednand returns a compact summary: the phases, their dependency edges, any ADR conflict it found. Hold the summary, never the full plan. - Approve once. Surface the plan summary to the maintainer: the
phases, their order, the dependency rationale, any ADR conflict.
This is the only up-front gate. On approval, write the initial
checkpoint and a campaign-context note
(
~/.agentic-sdk/<project>/runs/<slug>/context.md, gitignored) holding the invariants every phase shares: the base-on-tip rule and the base commit, the env contract, the commit and review policy. Each dispatch points to this note instead of retyping invariants, paying their token cost once. Then proceed unattended. - Auto-dispatch the DAG. Walk the DAG in topological order. For
each phase whose dependencies have all landed, dispatch one
change-runner via the Agent tool, at the model and effort the
phase's risk tier names. Its prompt is self-contained but lean: the
phase name, a pointer to its entry in
plan.edn(cited, not pasted), and a pointer to the campaign-context note for the shared invariants. The change-runner reads its phase from the plan, runs implement-change for it end to end in its own context, and returns exactly one line and nothing else:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 137 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 7589f701b4a8
advance-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository leifericf/agentic-sdk (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,830 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…