Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lemoncrow-lab/lemoncrow --skill exploregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lemoncrow-lab/lemoncrowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lemoncrow-lab/lemoncrow/explore)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lemoncrow-lab/lemoncrow/explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lemoncrow-lab/lemoncrow/explore/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lemoncrow-lab/lemoncrow/explore"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lemoncrow-lab/lemoncrow/explore.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00701 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
explore scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed 343e9ce14e56
- 26d ago Changed 005042d8eb79
- 1mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A d0dc884e634e
explore is a skill published in the GitHub repository lemoncrow-lab/lemoncrow (72 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 701 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
brain-page
Operating manual for reading and writing a project's brain — every read and write goes through the bundled zero-dependency brain CLI; never hand-edit brain files. Read it before creating or modifying any page or root page.
brain-setup
Bootstrap the Open Project Brain Standard into the current project — prefer brain init (ensure BRAIN.md, scaffold empty brain brainRoot-aware, default-wire CLAUDE.md + AGENTS.md). Optionally install a pre-commit hook and a Claude Code or Codex SessionStart hook.
brain-bootstrap
Seed a freshly-scaffolded brain with real project knowledge — on an existing (brownfield) project read the code, docs, and git log, then draft only the root pages that have meaningful content and capture key historical decisions; on a near-empty (greenfield) project interview the user. Every write goes through the…
brain-ingest
The process for digesting a conversation, document, or research result, classifying it, and writing it down as brain content (a root-page update or a new/updated page) through the brain CLI.
use-ivygrep
Gather focused local repository context with ivygrep before implementing, debugging, reviewing, or explaining code. Use for coding tasks involving unfamiliar paths, branch changes, stack traces, architectural relationships, callers, dependents, tests, configuration, or documentation. Prefer one bounded context pack…
outcome-run
Run one action in an outcome-loop folder. Use when the user wants to execute the outcome loop, start with Superdense reward maintenance, choose one action on a lever, create runs/ /work.md and learnings.md, or use prior outcomes to improve a real-world metric.