Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/leodorareluctant259/superpowers-zh/executing-plansnpx skills add Leodorareluctant259/superpowers-zh --skill executing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Leodorareluctant259/superpowers-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leodorareluctant259/superpowers-zh/executing-plans)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leodorareluctant259/superpowers-zh/executing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leodorareluctant259/superpowers-zh/executing-plans.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.01614 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00807 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00323 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00161 |
Grade A, and why
executing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to executing-plans — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 176 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
执行计划
概述
加载计划,批判性审查,执行所有任务,完成后报告。
开始时宣布: "我正在使用 executing-plans 技能来实现此计划。"
注意: 告诉你的人类伙伴,Superpowers 在有子代理支持时效果好得多。如果在支持子代理的平台上运行(如 Claude Code 或 Codex),其工作质量会显著提高。如果子代理可用,请使用 superpowers:subagent-driven-development 而非此技能。
流程
步骤 1:加载并审查计划
- 读取计划文件
- 批判性审查——识别计划中的任何问题或疑虑
- 如果有疑虑:在开始之前向你的人类伙伴提出
- 如果没有疑虑:创建 TodoWrite 并继续
审查时重点检查:
- 步骤之间是否有依赖遗漏?(A 依赖 B,但 B 排在 A 之后)
- 验证条件是否明确?("确认可用"不算,"运行
npm test全部通过"才算) - 是否有隐含的环境假设?(Node 版本、数据库连接、API Key)
审查示例:
计划文件:docs/plan.md
任务清单:5 个任务
审查发现:
- 任务 3(添加数据库迁移)应在任务 2(编写数据模型)之后,顺序正确 ✓
- 任务 4 的验证条件写的是"确认功能正常"→ 需澄清:具体跑什么测试?
- 计划未提及 Python 版本要求 → 需确认
向伙伴提出:
"计划整体可执行。有两个问题:(1) 任务 4 的验证条件不够具体,建议改为
'运行 pytest tests/test_api.py 全部通过';(2) 需要确认 Python 版本要求。"
步骤 2:执行任务
对于每个任务:
- 标记为进行中 — 更新 TodoWrite
- 理解目标 — 重读任务描述,明确完成标准
- 执行实现 — 严格按照计划步骤执行(计划已有小步骤)
- 运行验证 — 按要求运行测试或检查
- 提交变更 — 每完成一个任务提交一次,commit message 引用任务编号
- 标记为已完成 — 更新 TodoWrite
每个任务的节奏:
--- 任务 2/5:添加用户验证 ---
[标记进行中]
目标:为 /api/users 添加输入验证
完成标准:所有验证测试通过,无效输入返回 400
[实现]
- 添加 validateUser() 中间件
- 编写 3 个验证规则(email 格式、密码强度、用户名长度)
[验证]
$ npm test -- --grep "validation"
✓ 拒绝无效 email (12ms)
✓ 拒绝弱密码 (8ms)
✓ 拒绝过长用户名 (5ms)
3 passing
[提交]
$ git add src/middleware/validate.js tests/validation.test.js
$ git commit -m "feat: 添加用户输入验证(任务 2/5)"
[标记完成]
--- 任务 2/5 完成 ---
批量审查检查点:
- 每完成 3 个任务后,暂停回顾:整体方向还对吗?有没有偏离计划?
- 如果发现前面的实现有问题,先修复再继续,不要带着问题往下走
步骤 3:处理常见异常
测试失败:
- 读错误信息,定位失败原因
- 区分:是实现 bug?还是测试本身有问题?还是计划描述有误?
- 实现 bug → 修复并重跑
- 测试有问题 → 修复测试,向伙伴说明
- 计划有误 → 停下来,向伙伴报告并建议修正
依赖缺失:
任务 3 需要 Redis 连接,但计划中没有提及 Redis 配置。
→ 停止执行
→ 向伙伴报告:"任务 3 需要 Redis,计划中未包含配置步骤。
建议:在任务 3 前插入 '配置 Redis 连接' 步骤。"
指令不清:
- 不要猜测意图,不要"合理推断"
- 列出你的理解和困惑,让伙伴澄清
- 等待回复后再继续
步骤 4:完成开发
所有任务完成并验证后:
- 宣布:"我正在使用 finishing-a-development-branch 技能来完成此工作。"
- 必需子技能: 使用 superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch
- 按照该技能的指引验证测试、展示选项、执行选择
完成报告模板:
## 执行报告
**计划:** docs/plan.md
**分支:** feature/user-validation
**任务:** 5/5 已完成
### 完成的任务
1. ✅ 初始化项目结构
2. ✅ 添加用户验证
3. ✅ 添加数据库迁移
4. ✅ 实现 API 端点
5. ✅ 添加集成测试
### 验证结果
- 单元测试:23/23 通过
- 集成测试:8/8 通过
- lint 检查:0 个警告
### 偏离计划的地方
- 任务 3:Redis 配置从 env 改为 config.yaml(经伙伴同意)
### 下一步
按 finishing-a-development-branch 技能处理合并/PR
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 176 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 5c0946f003d4
executing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository Leodorareluctant259/superpowers-zh (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,614 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to executing-plans, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ainb-fleet:daemons
Runtime-health view of the four fleet daemons — phone bridge, notifyd, ATC, and the fleet auto-continue daemon — in one table. Each row reports state (running / stopped / unknown), pid, uptime, last activity, error count, and a HEALTH reason that distinguishes a clean stop from a crash (stale heartbeat) or a…
ainb-fleet
Fleet orchestration overview — the ainb fleet ... Rust subcommand namespace for driving every claude session on the host. Routes to the sub-skills (ainb-spawn / standup / broadcast / sequence / needs / daemon / atc). Invoke this for an at-a-glance map of what fleet can do; reach for the specific sub-skill for the verb…
ainb-fleet:bridge
Native phone bridge — relay messages two-way between a chat channel (Telegram, Slack, and/or Discord) and your ainb sessions. Inbound chat messages route to a target session (by name: prefix, else a conductor- first default) and are delivered via tmux send-keys; the session's reply is captured from its JSONL…
ainb-fleet:daemon
Long-running watcher that scans every claude session every 5s and auto-sends continue to any session whose recent tmux pane buffer matches a known API-error regex (ratelimited, overloadederror, internalservererror, requesttimeout, sockethangup, fetchfailed, ECONNRESET). Use this when you want unattended recovery from…
ainb-fleet:standup
Show fleet status — every claude session running on the host, merged across ainb + claude-peers broker + background jobs. Use when you need to enumerate sessions before composing an action, check the summary of each session, or pipe the list into jq for filtering. (Writes go via tmux by default; a peerid is just an…
ainb-fleet:cost
Show fleet spend — per-session, per-model, per-day, and per-group USD cost rollups for every claude/codex session, sourced live from ainb's burndown analytics (which already prices every provider call). Use when you need spend visibility across a multi-session fleet, want to find the most expensive session/model, or…