Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lessthanseventy/excessibility --skill e11y-tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lessthanseventy/excessibilityWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lessthanseventy/excessibility/e11y-tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lessthanseventy/excessibility/e11y-tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lessthanseventy/excessibility/e11y-tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lessthanseventy/excessibility/e11y-tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lessthanseventy/excessibility/e11y-tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.01179 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00589 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
e11y-tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 183 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Excessibility TDD - Build with Inspection
Build Phoenix LiveView features with full visibility into rendered HTML and state.
Core Powers
html_snapshot(view)- Capture HTML at any point (sprinkle liberally while building)- axe-core checks - Ensure accessibility (WCAG compliance)
- Timeline analysis - See state evolution across events
The e11y-TDD Cycle
1. EXPLORE - Add html_snapshot(view) calls to see what's rendered
2. RED - Write test with snapshot at key moment
3. GREEN - Implement feature, use snapshots to debug
4. CHECK - Run `mix excessibility` for axe-core/a11y validation
5. CLEAN - Remove temporary snapshots, keep essential ones
Snapshot Strategies
Temporary Snapshots (for building/debugging)
Sprinkle these while building. Delete when feature works.
test "building new feature" do
{:ok, view, _html} = live(conn, "/page")
# Sprinkle these to see what's happening
html_snapshot(view) # <- see initial state
view |> element("button") |> render_click()
html_snapshot(view) # <- see after click
view |> form("#my-form") |> render_submit(%{name: "test"})
html_snapshot(view) # <- see after submit
# Delete these when feature works
end
Permanent Snapshots (for regression testing)
Keep these - axe-core will check them on every run.
test "feature works and is accessible" do
{:ok, view, _html} = live(conn, "/page")
view |> element("button") |> render_click()
# Keep this - axe-core will check it on every run
html_snapshot(view)
end
When to Use
- Building any LiveView feature - snapshots show you what's rendered
- Debugging state issues - sprinkle snapshots, inspect, delete
- Accessibility compliance - axe-core catches WCAG violations
- Form implementations - see validation errors, field states
- Modals/dialogs - verify focus management, aria attributes
- Dynamic content - check aria-live regions render correctly
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 183 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A ccc8fdc112e5
e11y-tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository lessthanseventy/excessibility (42 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,179 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
react-web
React web development with hooks, React Query, Zustand.
iterative-development
TDD iteration loops using Claude Code Stop hooks - runs tests after each response, feeds failures back automatically.
python
Python development with ruff, mypy, pytest - TDD and type safety.
test-driven-development
Enforces TDD discipline with RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle. Use when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Ensures tests genuinely verify behavior.
Accessibility Auditor
Comprehensive WCAG 2.1 AA compliance testing combining automated axe-core scans with manual keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and focus management verification.
tdd-cycle
Execute full TDD red-green-refactor cycle with validation gates. Use when saying "TDD cycle", "test-driven development", or "full TDD workflow".