Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to lewing/helix.mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lewing/helix.mcp/main/.squad/skills/slop-audit/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lewing/helix.mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lewing/helix.mcp/slop-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lewing/helix.mcp/slop-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lewing/helix.mcp/slop-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lewing/helix.mcp/slop-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lewing/helix.mcp/slop-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02262 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01131 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00452 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00226 |
Grade A, and why
slop-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 209 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: Codebase Slop Audit (C#)
Domain: Code quality / technical debt discovery
Language: C# (but method generalizes to any language)
Effort: 2–4 hours for mid-size codebase (10K–50K LOC)
Output: Markdown report with prioritized findings, refactor recommendations, risk assessments
Definition of Slop (C#-specific)
Slop ≠ bugs or style violations. Slop = low-value, redundant code patterns that add maintenance burden without functional benefit:
- Copy-paste duplication: Near-identical methods/catch blocks across 2+ files (same logic, cosmetic variation)
- Boilerplate that should be a helper: Repeated try/catch+log, exception wrapping, JSON serialization
- Dead code: Unused
publicmethods, commented-out blocks, orphaned test methods - Pseudo-abstraction: Wrappers that delegate without adding value; interfaces with single implementations that don't aid testability
- Schema drift: DTOs/records that mirror each other with small differences (common in API → internal model → CLI model pipelines)
- String-template slop: Repeated error message patterns (
$"Failed to {action}: {ex.Message}") - Over-broad catches:
catch (Exception)masking specific failures; shadow catching with poor re-throw - Magic number/string repetition: Same literal in 5+ call sites (should be
constor helper) - Long methods screaming for extraction: 100+ LOC with clear logical phases
- Test slop: Repeated arrange blocks; copy-paste test methods varying by 1 parameter (should be
[Theory]/[InlineData])
Audit Method (Systematic)
Phase 1: Baseline & Survey (30 min)
-
Count LOC by directory:
find src -name '*.cs' -not -path '*/obj/*' -not -path '*/bin/*' \ -not -name '*.g.cs' -type f -exec wc -l {} + | sort -rn | head -20- Establish baseline (total LOC).
- Identify largest files (slop often correlates with size).
-
List all source files by size:
find src -name '*.cs' -type f ! -path '*/obj/*' | xargs wc -l | sort -rn- Top 10–20 files merit deep inspection.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 209 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1a85fe2d5a1e
slop-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository lewing/helix.mcp (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,262 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
Adversarial fresh-context review of an increment before it ships. Every finding cites path:line and is re-verified. Use when saying "review", "grill this", or "critique the implementation".
sw-review
Adversarial fresh-context review of an increment before it ships; every finding cites path:line and is re-verified. Use for "review this", "critique the implementation", "review before closing".
argot-setup
Set argot up for a repository end to end — audit its history, decide what should shape its voice, fit, verify the fit actually catches things, tune the rules its own history says are noisy, and wire the places it runs (pre-write hook, pre-commit, MCP, CI). One sitting, one decision at a time, each proposed with the…
argot-check
Score your working changes with argot — flag code foreign to this repo's own patterns (unfamiliar dependencies, APIs, constructs), functions the repo already has, code filed in the wrong place, imports that break the repo's layering, and tests weakened, disabled, or deleted alongside a production change — before…
argot-write-rule
Codify a repo convention argot's built-ins don't cover into a scripted custom rule — a .argot/rules/NAME/rule.toml manifest plus a sandboxed Rhai script that fires exactly like a built-in, gated on a green fixture suite before it ever sees a real diff. Use when the user asks to "write an argot rule for X", "codify…
argot-review-pr
Review a specific pull request (or diff range) against this repo's learned patterns with argot, without checking it out — flag dependencies, APIs, and constructs foreign to how the repo is written, duplicated functions, misfiled code, layering breaks, and tests weakened, disabled, or deleted alongside a production…