Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lexler/skill-factory --skill nullablesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lexler/skill-factoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lexler/skill-factory/nullables)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lexler/skill-factory/nullables"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lexler/skill-factory/nullables/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lexler/skill-factory/nullables"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lexler/skill-factory/nullables.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.01935 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00774 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00387 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00194 |
Grade A, and why
nullables scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Nullables: Testing Without Mocks
STARTER_CHARACTER = ⭕️
Nullables are production code with an off switch: classes with external I/O anywhere in their dependencies offer create() (real) and createNull() (I/O disabled, everything else runs normally). Tests are narrow (focused on one class), sociable (dependencies run for real), and state-based (assert outputs and state, never method calls). Don't use mocking libraries or DI frameworks — Nullables make them unnecessary.
The cut
Stub at the lowest point — the third-party edge — never your own code:
OrderService → PaymentClient → HttpClient → third-party lib
app code high-level low-level ✂ stubbed when nulled
wrapper wrapper
PaymentClientis a high-level wrapper: it abstracts one service and speaks domain language.HttpClientis a low-level wrapper: it abstracts one technology and is generic and highly reusable.- The low-level wrapper holds the fork:
create()wires the real library (node http, RestTemplate);createNull()wires an embedded stub — your code, returning canned data, doing no I/O. - Everything left of the cut is your code and runs for real in tests.
With mocks, you only mock code you own; with Nullables, you only stub code you don't own. Only the bottom layer has a stub — one per technology. Everything above runs real in tests, so a bug anywhere in your code turns tests red. Mocking your own classes breaks that chain: mocked code never runs, and its bugs hide behind green tests.
An invented internal seam is the same break in disguise: cutting at rows() → List<Row> instead of the driver puts your mapping loop below the seam, where nulled tests never run it. The test: any parsing, mapping, or normalization you wrote must sit above the cut. When the third-party API is a chain of objects, mirror it — one stub class can play the whole chain (see the low-level wrapper files).
Two channels, plus events
Every class that talks to infrastructure anywhere in its dependencies offers the same two factory methods:
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- credits.md 604 B
- references/architecture.md 2.9 KB
- references/building-high-level-wrappers.md 8.2 KB
- references/building-low-level-wrappers-dynamic.md 11 KB
- references/building-low-level-wrappers-static.md 14 KB
- references/consuming-nullables.md 8.1 KB
- references/migration.md 5.2 KB
- references/utilities.md 5.2 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 93 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 0ead4895567d
nullables is a skill published in the GitHub repository lexler/skill-factory (239 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,935 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3
Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
dart-test
DART Test: unit tests, integration tests, CI validation, and debugging.
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
mobiai-ios-testing
Use when writing or running tests in an iOS project — unit tests, UI tests, snapshot tests, choosing the right framework.