Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lfyxhappy/lfcode --skill lfcode-plugin-authorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lfyxhappy/lfcodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lfyxhappy/lfcode/lfcode-plugin-author)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lfyxhappy/lfcode/lfcode-plugin-author"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lfyxhappy/lfcode/lfcode-plugin-author/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lfyxhappy/lfcode/lfcode-plugin-author"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lfyxhappy/lfcode/lfcode-plugin-author.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00428 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00171 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
lfcode-plugin-author scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Lfcode Plugin Author
Use the managed authoring workflow. Never write directly into the installed plugin library.
Allowed scope
- Create only
toolorintegrationplugins. - Work only through
plugin_authorinside the managed workspace for the requested plugin ID. - Use the public
@lfcode-ai/pluginSDK. Do not import private runtime modules frompackages/lfcode. - Do not claim
officialorbundledtrust. Model-authored plugins areexternal.
Required workflow
- Call
plugin_authorwithcreateto create a minimal workspace. - Inspect and edit only that workspace with normal file tools.
- Call
plugin_authorwithvalidate; fix every blocking error. - Add a focused real test when the plugin contains behavior beyond the generated placeholder.
- Call
plugin_authorwithpreviewand show the full review report to the user. - Stop and request explicit confirmation. Do not treat the request to create the plugin as confirmation to install it.
- Only after confirmation, pass the returned token to
plugin_managewithimport_commit. - Verify the installed plugin appears in
plugin_manage listand is visible from the next provider turn.
Prohibited actions
- Do not write
<lfcode-data>/plugins/library,current.json, orregistry.jsondirectly. - Do not bypass preview tokens, fabricate digests, extend expiry, or reuse a consumed token.
- Do not generate
provider,ui,theme,runtime, ormixedplugins in the first authoring version. - Do not add native executables, install scripts, dynamic libraries, credentials, tokens, or machine-specific absolute paths.
- Do not automatically approve, enable, replace, uninstall, or export outside the managed workflow.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 844de09983f9
lfcode-plugin-author is a skill published in the GitHub repository lfyxhappy/lfcode (2 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 428 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
Review a GitHub PR (via gh)
Review a specific GitHub pull request with gh — fetch the diff, fan out reviewers, consolidate, and optionally post the review. Requires the gh CLI or the GitHub MCP server.
Best of N (parallel attempts)
Delegate N parallel subagents on the same task, then pick the best result.
Design doc (write -> review loop)
Draft a design document and iterate writer/reviewer subagents until consensus.
Implement (multi-agent loop)
Orchestrate an implement -> review -> fix loop with subagents until reviewers sign off.
PR babysit (watch & drive to green)
Watch a pull request and delegate fixes until CI is green and reviews are addressed. Requires the GitHub MCP server or gh.
Review changes (multi-agent)
Delegate read-only reviewers over the local changes/branch and consolidate findings.