Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/lgbarn/trading-indicator-plugins/pine-patternsnpx skills add lgbarn/trading-indicator-plugins --skill pine-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lgbarn/trading-indicator-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lgbarn/trading-indicator-plugins/pine-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lgbarn/trading-indicator-plugins/pine-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lgbarn/trading-indicator-plugins/pine-patterns.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01458 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00729 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00292 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00146 |
Grade A, and why
pine-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 208 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A c600744d200b
pine-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository lgbarn/trading-indicator-plugins (34 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,458 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
tradingview-opencode-agent
TradingView Desktop AI assistant via MCP. Dispatcher a 5 sub-skills especializadas: chart-analysis, pine-develop, replay-practice, multi-symbol-scan, strategy-report.
pine-develop
Full Pine Script development loop — write code, compile, fix errors, iterate. Use when building a new indicator or strategy in TradingView.
strategy-report
Generate a comprehensive strategy performance report — metrics, trade analysis, equity curve, and recommendations. Use after backtesting a Pine Script strategy.
multi-symbol-scan
Scan multiple symbols for setups, patterns, or strategy performance. Use when comparing across instruments or screening for opportunities.
chart-analysis
Analyze a chart — set up symbol/timeframe, add indicators, scroll to key dates, annotate, and screenshot. Use when the user wants technical analysis or chart review.
replay-practice
Practice trading in TradingView replay mode — step through historical bars, take trades, track P&L. Use when the user wants to practice or backtest manually.