Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/lhl/realitycheck/rc-extractnpx skills add lhl/realitycheck --skill rc-extractgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lhl/realitycheckWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lhl/realitycheck/rc-extract)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lhl/realitycheck/rc-extract"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lhl/realitycheck/rc-extract.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00840 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00420 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
rc-extract scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quick Claim Extraction
Extract claims from a source without performing full 3-stage analysis. Use for quick claim harvesting or supporting sources.
When This Skill Activates
- "Extract claims from"
- "Quick extract"
- "Harvest claims from"
Extract claims from a source without performing full 3-stage analysis. Use for quick claim harvesting or when sources are supporting evidence rather than primary subjects.
When to Use
- Quick extraction of claims from supporting sources
- Building cross-reference evidence for existing claims
- Initial triage before deciding on full analysis
- Sources that are data-heavy rather than argument-heavy
Output Format
claims:
- id: "DOMAIN-YYYY-NNN"
text: "[Precise claim statement]"
type: "[F/T/H/P/A/C/S/X]"
domain: "[DOMAIN]"
evidence_level: "E[1-6]"
credence: 0.XX
source_ids: ["[source-id]"]
Claim Types
| Type | Symbol | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Fact | [F] |
Empirically verified, consensus reality |
| Theory | [T] |
Coherent explanatory framework with empirical support |
| Hypothesis | [H] |
Testable proposition, awaiting evidence |
| Prediction | [P] |
Future-oriented claim with specified conditions |
| Assumption | [A] |
Underlying premise (stated or unstated) |
| Counterfactual | [C] |
Alternative scenario for comparison |
| Speculation | [S] |
Unfalsifiable or untestable claim |
| Contradiction | [X] |
Identified logical inconsistency |
Evidence Hierarchy
Use this hierarchy to rate strength of evidential support for claims.
| Level | Strength | Description | Credence Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Strong Empirical | Systematic review, meta-analysis, replicated experiments | 0.9-1.0 |
| E2 | Moderate Empirical | Single peer-reviewed study, official statistics | 0.6-0.8 |
| E3 | Strong Theoretical | Expert consensus, working papers, preprints | 0.5-0.7 |
| E4 | Weak Theoretical | Industry reports, credible journalism | 0.3-0.5 |
| E5 | Opinion/Forecast | Personal observation, anecdote, expert opinion | 0.2-0.4 |
| E6 | Unsupported | Pure speculation, unfalsifiable claims | 0.0-0.2 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 99 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 9794aed21d37
rc-extract is a skill published in the GitHub repository lhl/realitycheck (41 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 840 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Deep Research
Produce a deep, structured research report on a topic: decompose into key dimensions, analyze each with evidence and reasoning, synthesize cross-cutting insights, and surface open questions. Use for deep research, analysis, and literature/landscape reviews.
document-query
Use when reading, extracting, summarizing, comparing, or answering questions over local or remote documents, code files, PDFs, Office files, HTML/text files, large text-heavy files, and fallback OCR for document images or scans when vision tools are unavailable or insufficient.
military-scout
深入调查，掌握实情，找出问题根因.
data-analysis
Analyze datasets and create visualizations.
jupyter-notebook
Jupyter notebook structure, reproducibility, and best practices for data science.
Jupyter Live Kernel
Guides notebook-first analysis with reproducible kernels, inspectable data loading, and explicit promotion paths back into durable code.