Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Liberty91LTD/cti-skills --skill hacktivismgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Liberty91LTD/cti-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/hacktivism)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/hacktivism"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/hacktivism/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/hacktivism"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/hacktivism.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.03073 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01537 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00615 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00307 |
Grade A, and why
hacktivism scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hacktivism
Executive Summary
The hacktivist landscape has been fundamentally reshaped since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, triggering an unprecedented surge in politically and geopolitically motivated cyber operations. The conflict spawned dozens of pro-Russian and pro-Ukrainian hacktivist groups conducting DDoS attacks, website defacements, data leaks, and in some cases more destructive operations against perceived adversary nations. The most significant development is the blurring of lines between genuine grassroots hacktivism and state-directed or state-aligned operations that use hacktivist branding as cover for intelligence service activities. Groups like KillNet, NoName057(16), and Anonymous Sudan have operated with varying degrees of suspected state alignment, complicating attribution and threat assessment.
The Israel-Hamas conflict beginning in October 2023 opened a second major front for hacktivist activity, with pro-Palestinian and pro-Israeli groups conducting operations against each other and their perceived supporters. Groups targeting Israel and allied nations included pre-existing pro-Russian groups (demonstrating geopolitical alignment patterns), dedicated pro-Palestinian groups, and Iranian-aligned hacktivist personas. The convergence of pro-Russian and pro-Palestinian hacktivist activities reflects broader geopolitical alignment patterns and suggests coordination or at minimum shared infrastructure among some groups.
Despite the volume of hacktivist activity, the actual impact of most operations remains limited. DDoS attacks — the dominant hacktivist tactic — cause temporary service disruptions but rarely inflict lasting damage. Website defacements are symbolic. However, some groups have escalated to more consequential operations: targeting operational technology (OT) and industrial control systems (ICS), leaking sensitive databases, and conducting wiper attacks. Anonymous Sudan (identified by researchers as likely two Sudanese nationals, though with suspected state connections) demonstrated that even a small group could conduct DDoS attacks disruptive enough to temporarily impact major services including Microsoft, Cloudflare, and multiple US hospitals. The group's members were indicted by the US DOJ in October 2024.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 125 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A e49a63120bc1
hacktivism is a skill published in the GitHub repository Liberty91LTD/cti-skills (17 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 3,073 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-humanizer-zh
A Chinese writing editor that detects signs of AI-generated prose and rewrites the text to sound more natural.
ai-ab-testing
An AI-assisted guide for designing A/B tests, which compare two versions to see which performs better. The description gives no further details about its operation.
ai-accessibility
A Chinese-language assistant for diagnosing accessibility and ease-of-use problems in a page or service. Accessibility means making digital products usable by people with different abilities and needs.
ai-account-research-sales-card
A sales-growth assistant for understanding why a customer is not moving a deal forward. It uses the information you provide to organize the situation and recommend actions.
ai-account-research
A customer-research assistant for breaking down a potential customer and deciding how to approach them. It uses the materials you provide to shape a sales plan.
ai-ad-copy-compliance-review
A risk-review assistant for advertising and sales copy. It examines provided material for possible concerns and suggests actions.