Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Liberty91LTD/cti-skills --skill hash-investigationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Liberty91LTD/cti-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/hash-investigation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/hash-investigation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/hash-investigation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/hash-investigation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/hash-investigation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.01884 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00942 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00377 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00188 |
Grade A, and why
hash-investigation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 165 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
hash-investigation
Investigate a file hash end-to-end. Chain lookups, surface malware family attribution, prioritize infrastructure pivots, and decide whether deeper malware analysis is warranted.
This skill invokes: /lookup-liberty91 (first-party — run first), /lookup-virustotal, /lookup-otx, optionally /lookup-reversinglabs (vendor-authoritative classification + MITRE ATT&CK + sandbox), optionally /lookup-crowdstrike (Falcon Intel verdict + actor/malware attribution), optionally /lookup-misp and/or /lookup-opencti (internal correlation), optionally /lookup-sentinel (exposure check in your own telemetry), optionally /malware-analysis, then /source-assessment, /tlp-guide, /confidence-levels.
When to invoke
- User asks to check a hash, identify malware, or enrich a sample
- Another skill surfaces a hash during investigation (e.g.,
/ip-investigationfound communicating files) - User asks "what is this malware" with a hash as input
Inputs
indicator: <MD5 | SHA-1 | SHA-256 hash>
context: <optional — where did this hash come from?>
tlp_ceiling: <optional, default AMBER>
request_malware_analysis: <optional bool — trigger /malware-analysis after lookup>
Procedure
1. Validate
- Confirm the hash is a valid length (MD5=32, SHA-1=40, SHA-256=64 hex chars)
- Reject if not; route to correct skill if it looks like a different indicator type
2. Parallel lookups
Always run (free / commonly available):
/lookup-virustotal hash <value> # detection stats, family, behavior tags
/lookup-otx hash <value> # community pulses, campaign attribution
Add to the same parallel batch if credentials are configured — don't demote these to "later, maybe":
/lookup-reversinglabs hash <value> --av-scanners --ticloud # if $REVERSINGLABS_USER is set. Vendor-authoritative verdict + threat name + AV detection ratio. RL is the strongest single-source verdict on a hash; run it whenever available, not just when VT signal is thin.
/lookup-crowdstrike indicator <value> # if $CROWDSTRIKE_CLIENT_ID is set. Falcon Intel verdict — malicious confidence + the threat actors and malware families CrowdStrike links to this hash + report refs. One API call.
/lookup-liberty91 ioc-lookup <value> # if $LIBERTY91_API_KEY is set. First-party — run first: does your own platform already hold this hash, with what verdict, confidence and TLP?
/lookup-misp search-attributes --value <value> # if $MISP_URL + $MISP_KEY are set. Internal correlation against your own catalogued events.
/lookup-opencti lookup <value> # if $OPENCTI_URL + $OPENCTI_TOKEN are set. Internal correlation against your OpenCTI knowledge base (observables + indicators in one call).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 165 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A e06090d82678
hash-investigation is a skill published in the GitHub repository Liberty91LTD/cti-skills (18 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 1,884 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-ad-copy-compliance-review
A risk-review assistant for advertising and sales copy. It examines provided material for possible concerns and suggests actions.
ai-agent-browser
A business-diagnosis assistant for marketing, operations, product, and sales questions. It breaks down a goal and produces a summary, findings, action suggestions, and reusable deliverables.
ai-article
A Chinese-language assistant for turning source material into article and content-operation deliverables. It is aimed at creators, marketers, technical teams, and media publishers.
ai-brand-voice-review
A business-diagnosis assistant for marketing, operations, services, and sales questions.
ai-browser-use
A business-diagnosis assistant for marketing, operations, product, and sales questions about how to approach a task.
ai-content-material-audit
A Chinese-language copy-review assistant for creators, marketers, operators, and media teams.