Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Liberty91LTD/cti-skills --skill initial-access-brokersgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Liberty91LTD/cti-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/initial-access-brokers)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/initial-access-brokers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/initial-access-brokers/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/initial-access-brokers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/initial-access-brokers.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.06697 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.02679 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01339 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00670 |
Grade A, and why
initial-access-brokers scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 207 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Initial Access Brokers
Executive Summary
Initial Access Brokers (IABs) are specialized cybercriminal actors who gain unauthorized access to corporate networks and sell or hand that access to other threat actors, most commonly ransomware and data-extortion crews. They decouple the intrusion phase from the monetization phase, which lets buyers skip the slowest part of an attack. The model is unchanged; the venues, the prices and the way vendors track brokers all changed materially between 2025 and 2026.
The forum landscape the market relied on has been broken up. The alleged administrator of XSS was arrested in Kyiv on 22 July 2025 and the forum's clear-web domains were seized; a site under the XSS name returned under a new administrator, but former moderators left to found DamageLib and trust in XSS has not recovered [9][10][11]. BreachForums lost its domains to an FBI seizure in October 2025 and has since split into competing successors [12]. RAMP, the one major forum that openly permitted ransomware advertising, was seized by the FBI on 28 January 2026 and its administrator said he would not rebuild it [13][14]. Of the three forums this cell previously named as the core venues, only Exploit is still operating without a known disruption. Ransomware actors have dispersed to newer forums such as Rehub and T1erOne rather than consolidating on one successor, and both XSS and Exploit have restated their bans on ransomware activity [13].
Pricing data is vendor-specific and the two most recent Rapid7 datasets are not directly comparable. For the second half of 2024 Rapid7 reported an average base price of just over $2,700 across Exploit, XSS and BreachForums, with nearly 40% of offers priced between $500 and $1,000 [15][16]. For 2025, with DarkForums and RAMP added to the dataset, Rapid7 reported an average base price of $113,275, which it attributes largely to very high-value listings on DarkForums [17]. Most listings bundle a privilege level with the access vector: 71.4% in the 2024 data, and domain admin in roughly a third of 2025 listings that stated a privilege [16][17].
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +63 lines 736950165631
- 2mo ago First seen · 144 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A df26aa3b86e9
initial-access-brokers is a skill published in the GitHub repository Liberty91LTD/cti-skills (36 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 6,697 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence
Systematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use…
analyzing-threat-actor-ttps-with-mitre-attack
MITRE ATT&CK is a globally-accessible knowledge base of adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) based on real-world observations. This skill covers systematically mapping threat actor beh.
analyzing-threat-landscape-with-misp
Analyze the threat landscape using MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) by querying event statistics, attribute distributions, threat actor galaxy clusters, and tag trends over time. Uses PyMISP to pull event data, compute IOC type breakdowns, identify top threat actors and malware families, and generate threat…
analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence
Use when campaign attribution analysis involves systematically evaluating evidence to determine which threat actor or group is responsible for a cyber operation. This skill covers collecting and weighting attr.
prompt-injection-auditor
Security audit of LLM system prompts, agent instruction files (SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md), and agent configurations against prompt injection attacks. Use when the user wants to (1) audit or harden a system prompt or agent instructions against prompt injection, (2) review an agent skill or system prompt for…
analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence
Campaign attribution analysis involves systematically evaluating evidence to determine which threat actor or group is responsible for a cyber operation. This skill covers collecting and weighting attr.