Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Liberty91LTD/cti-skills --skill key-assumptions-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Liberty91LTD/cti-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/key-assumptions-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/key-assumptions-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/key-assumptions-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/key-assumptions-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/key-assumptions-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00657 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00329 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
key-assumptions-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Key Assumptions Check
Every analytical judgment rests on assumptions — often unstated. This technique surfaces them and evaluates whether the analysis holds if assumptions are wrong.
Procedure
Step 1: State the Analytical Line
Write the current assessment or conclusion in one clear sentence.
Step 2: List All Assumptions
Brainstorm every assumption underlying the assessment. Include:
- Assumptions about threat actor intent or capability
- Assumptions about data completeness or accuracy
- Assumptions about the relevance of historical patterns
- Assumptions about the target environment
- Assumptions about timing or sequencing
Step 3: Evaluate Each Assumption
| Assumption | Importance | Confidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Assumption 1] | High | High | Validated |
| [Assumption 2] | High | Low | FLAG |
| [Assumption 3] | Medium | Medium | Monitor |
| [Assumption 4] | Low | High | Accepted |
Importance: How much does the conclusion depend on this assumption?
- High: If wrong, the conclusion changes significantly
- Medium: If wrong, the conclusion weakens but may still hold
- Low: If wrong, the conclusion is largely unaffected
Confidence: How sure are we this assumption is correct?
- High: Strong evidence supports it
- Medium: Some evidence, but not fully validated
- Low: Little or no evidence; assumed by default
Step 4: Flag Critical Assumptions
Any assumption that is High Importance + Low Confidence is critical. These are the assumptions most likely to invalidate your analysis.
Step 5: Determine Impact
For each flagged assumption:
- What would the conclusion be if this assumption is wrong?
- Can this assumption be validated through additional collection?
- Should the confidence level of the overall assessment be lowered?
Output Template
## Key Assumptions Check: [Assessment Title]
### Analytical Line
[The assessment being checked]
### Assumptions Matrix
| # | Assumption | Importance | Confidence | Status |
|---|-----------|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| 1 | ... | H/M/L | H/M/L | ... |
### Flagged Assumptions (High Importance + Low/Medium Confidence)
1. **[Assumption]**: If wrong, [impact on conclusion]. Collection gap: [what would validate this].
### Impact on Assessment
[Does the assumptions check change the confidence level? Should the conclusion be qualified?]
### Recommended Actions
- [Validate assumption X through Y collection]
- [Lower confidence from High to Moderate because of assumption Z]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 77 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 442ae4158486
key-assumptions-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository Liberty91LTD/cti-skills (18 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 657 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-ab-testing
An AI-assisted guide for designing A/B tests, which compare two versions to see which performs better. The description gives no further details about its operation.
ai-accessibility
A Chinese-language assistant for diagnosing accessibility and ease-of-use problems in a page or service. Accessibility means making digital products usable by people with different abilities and needs.
ai-account-research-sales-card
A sales-growth assistant for understanding why a customer is not moving a deal forward. It uses the information you provide to organize the situation and recommend actions.
ai-account-research
A customer-research assistant for breaking down a potential customer and deciding how to approach them. It uses the materials you provide to shape a sales plan.
ai-ad-copy-compliance-review
A risk-review assistant for advertising and sales copy. It examines provided material for possible concerns and suggests actions.
ai-ad-creative
An advertising-creative review assistant for assessing whether an ad idea is likely to attract attention. It examines the material you provide and suggests improvements.