Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Liberty91LTD/cti-skills --skill pir-managementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Liberty91LTD/cti-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/pir-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/pir-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/pir-management/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/pir-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/pir-management.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.01140 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00456 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00228 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
pir-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 140 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR) Management
PIRs are the foundation of relevant intelligence. They define what stakeholders need to know and drive all collection and analysis priorities. Without PIRs, a CTI team produces intelligence nobody asked for.
What is a PIR?
A PIR is a question that, when answered, directly supports a stakeholder's decision-making. PIRs are:
- Stakeholder-driven — not what the analyst finds interesting
- Decision-oriented — answering them enables action
- Bounded — specific enough to collect against
- Reviewable — can be assessed for satisfaction
PIR Format (SMART)
Each PIR should be:
- Specific: Clear scope and focus
- Measurable: Can determine when it's answered
- Achievable: Can be collected against with available resources
- Relevant: Directly supports stakeholder decisions
- Time-bound: Has a review/expiry date
PIR Template
Store in data/pirs/active/PIR-XXX-<slug>.md:
---
pir_id: PIR-001
title: "What ransomware groups are actively targeting the European healthcare sector?"
created: 2026-01-15
review_date: 2026-04-15
status: active
priority: high
stakeholder: CISO
collection_sources: [osint, virustotal, otx]
knowledge_cells: [ransomware-ecosystem]
last_satisfied: 2026-03-01
satisfaction_count: 3
---
## Context
Why this PIR matters to the stakeholder. What decisions depend on the answer.
## Standing Requirements
- Monitor for new ransomware campaigns targeting healthcare
- Track ransomware group infrastructure changes
- Assess likelihood of targeting our specific organisation
## Collection Guidance
- OSINT: Monitor vendor reports, ISAC feeds, government advisories
- Technical: Enrich IOCs from healthcare-targeted campaigns
- Dark web: Monitor ransomware leak sites for healthcare victims
## Satisfaction History
| Date | Product | Summary |
|------|---------|---------|
| 2026-03-01 | Flash Report FR-2026-03-01 | New BlackCat campaign targeting EU hospitals |
| 2026-02-15 | Intelligence Summary IS-2026-02-15 | Monthly ransomware landscape update |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 140 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A b6e12b703047
pir-management is a skill published in the GitHub repository Liberty91LTD/cti-skills (36 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 1,140 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence
Systematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use…
analyzing-threat-actor-ttps-with-mitre-attack
MITRE ATT&CK is a globally-accessible knowledge base of adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) based on real-world observations. This skill covers systematically mapping threat actor beh.
analyzing-threat-landscape-with-misp
Analyze the threat landscape using MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) by querying event statistics, attribute distributions, threat actor galaxy clusters, and tag trends over time. Uses PyMISP to pull event data, compute IOC type breakdowns, identify top threat actors and malware families, and generate threat…
analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence
Use when campaign attribution analysis involves systematically evaluating evidence to determine which threat actor or group is responsible for a cyber operation. This skill covers collecting and weighting attr.
prompt-injection-auditor
Security audit of LLM system prompts, agent instruction files (SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md), and agent configurations against prompt injection attacks. Use when the user wants to (1) audit or harden a system prompt or agent instructions against prompt injection, (2) review an agent skill or system prompt for…
analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence
Campaign attribution analysis involves systematically evaluating evidence to determine which threat actor or group is responsible for a cyber operation. This skill covers collecting and weighting attr.