Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Liberty91LTD/cti-skills --skill structured-analytic-techniquesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Liberty91LTD/cti-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/structured-analytic-techniques)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/structured-analytic-techniques"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/structured-analytic-techniques/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/structured-analytic-techniques"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/structured-analytic-techniques.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.01233 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00493 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00247 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
structured-analytic-techniques scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Structured Analytic Techniques (SATs) Index
SATs are formal methods that externalise analytical thinking, making it transparent, challengeable, and less susceptible to cognitive biases. Choose the right technique based on the analytical challenge.
When to Use SATs
- When the stakes are high (wrong answer = significant consequence)
- When multiple plausible explanations exist
- When cognitive biases are likely (confirmation, anchoring, availability)
- When you need to communicate your reasoning transparently
- When building on analysis from multiple analysts
Start With the Evidence
The Quality of Information Check is the default first step of any diagnostic run. Before hypotheses are tested or an assessment is written, run /quality-of-information-check on the reports and articles the analysis will rest on. It resolves each one to its originating source, splits it into claims and grades each claim. ach, threat-assessment and writing-assessments prefer graded evidence and run the check themselves when handed raw material.
Skip it when the evidence already arrives as graded evidence items, when there are no documents to grade, or when the user asks to. A skipped check puts those three skills in ungraded mode: the output is labelled as ungraded and confidence is capped at Moderate. Hits in the organisation's own telemetry enter as observations graded "direct, established" (rubric rule R12). Third-party lookup results are rated through source-assessment on the Admiralty scale, which is a separate instrument: the evidence grade applies to claims from documents, and neither is converted into the other.
Technique Categories
Families follow the CIA Tradecraft Primer. The full list, one line per technique with the covering skill or "not in the pack", is in references/when-to-use.md.
Diagnostic Techniques
Purpose: Evaluate existing analysis for quality and bias.
| Technique | When to Use | Skill |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Information Check | First, before any other diagnostic technique. Resolve provenance, split reports into claims, grade each claim, list gaps | quality-of-information-check |
| Key Assumptions Check | Before or after any major assessment — surface and challenge unstated assumptions | key-assumptions-check |
| Analysis of Competing Hypotheses | Multiple plausible explanations — systematically evaluate each against evidence | ach |
| Indicators or Signposts of Change | When monitoring a developing situation — define observable markers of change | Not in the pack. horizon-scanning defines early warning indicators in part |
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +18 lines · +22 tokens per session 935a6ec0bc1d
- 2mo ago First seen · 83 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A ee6935d730bc
structured-analytic-techniques is a skill published in the GitHub repository Liberty91LTD/cti-skills (36 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 1,233 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence
Systematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use…
analyzing-threat-actor-ttps-with-mitre-attack
MITRE ATT&CK is a globally-accessible knowledge base of adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) based on real-world observations. This skill covers systematically mapping threat actor beh.
analyzing-threat-landscape-with-misp
Analyze the threat landscape using MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) by querying event statistics, attribute distributions, threat actor galaxy clusters, and tag trends over time. Uses PyMISP to pull event data, compute IOC type breakdowns, identify top threat actors and malware families, and generate threat…
analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence
Use when campaign attribution analysis involves systematically evaluating evidence to determine which threat actor or group is responsible for a cyber operation. This skill covers collecting and weighting attr.
prompt-injection-auditor
Security audit of LLM system prompts, agent instruction files (SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md), and agent configurations against prompt injection attacks. Use when the user wants to (1) audit or harden a system prompt or agent instructions against prompt injection, (2) review an agent skill or system prompt for…
analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence
Campaign attribution analysis involves systematically evaluating evidence to determine which threat actor or group is responsible for a cyber operation. This skill covers collecting and weighting attr.