Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Liberty91LTD/cti-skills --skill threat-actor-profilinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Liberty91LTD/cti-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/threat-actor-profiling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/threat-actor-profiling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/threat-actor-profiling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/threat-actor-profiling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liberty91ltd/cti-skills/threat-actor-profiling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.01615 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00807 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00323 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00161 |
Grade A, and why
threat-actor-profiling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 117 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Threat Actor Profiling
A threat actor profile is a living document that consolidates everything known about a threat group. It grows over time as new intelligence is collected.
Profile Template
## Threat Actor Profile: [Primary Name]
### Summary
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| **Primary Name** | [Most commonly used name] |
| **Aliases** | [All known aliases across vendors] |
| **Attribution** | [State sponsor / Criminal group / Hacktivist — with confidence level] |
| **Affiliation** | [Specific agency/unit if known, e.g., GRU Unit 26165] |
| **Motivation** | [Espionage / Financial / Disruption / Hacktivism / Mixed] |
| **Active Since** | [Year of first known activity] |
| **Status** | [Active / Dormant / Disbanded] |
| **Sophistication** | [Low / Medium / High / Advanced] |
| **Primary Targets** | [Sectors and geographies] |
| **Assessment Date** | [Date of this profile version] |
### Attribution Assessment
[Detailed attribution discussion with confidence level. Who attributes this group and based on what evidence? Where do vendors disagree?]
### Targeting
**Sectors**: [List targeted sectors with evidence]
**Geographies**: [Targeted countries/regions]
**Selection criteria**: [How does this group choose targets? Opportunistic vs targeted?]
**Evolution**: [How has targeting changed over time?]
### TTPs (MITRE ATT&CK)
| Tactic | Technique | ID | Notes |
|--------|-----------|-----|-------|
| Initial Access | Spearphishing Attachment | T1566.001 | Primary delivery method |
| Execution | PowerShell | T1059.001 | Used for download and execute |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
### Tooling
| Tool | Type | Custom/Commodity | First Seen | Status | Notes |
|------|------|-----------------|-----------|--------|-------|
| [Tool 1] | Backdoor | Custom | 2024 | Active | Primary implant |
| Cobalt Strike | C2 | Commodity | 2023 | Active | Used with modified profiles |
### Infrastructure Patterns
- **Hosting preferences**: [Cloud providers, bulletproof hosting, compromised infrastructure]
- **Registrars**: [Preferred domain registrars]
- **TLS patterns**: [Self-signed? Let's Encrypt? Specific CAs?]
- **C2 protocols**: [HTTP/HTTPS, DNS, custom protocols]
- **IP ranges**: [Known IP blocks or ASNs]
### Campaign History
#### [Campaign 1] (YYYY-MM to YYYY-MM)
- **Targets**: [Who was targeted]
- **TTPs**: [Specific techniques used]
- **Outcome**: [Impact, attribution confidence]
- **References**: [Vendor reports]
### Relationships
- **Related groups**: [Parent/child groups, shared infrastructure, shared tools]
- **Overlap with**: [Groups that share TTPs or infrastructure]
- **Distinction from**: [Commonly confused groups and how to distinguish]
### Intelligence Gaps
- [What we don't know and need to collect]
- [Specific questions for future collection]
### Sources
| Date | Source | Reliability | Key Contribution |
|------|--------|-------------|-----------------|
| YYYY-MM-DD | [Source] | [Admiralty] | [What this source contributed to the profile] |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 117 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A edcef7c4f9d3
threat-actor-profiling is a skill published in the GitHub repository Liberty91LTD/cti-skills (18 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,615 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-ad-copy-compliance-review
A risk-review assistant for advertising and sales copy. It examines provided material for possible concerns and suggests actions.
ai-agent-browser
A business-diagnosis assistant for marketing, operations, product, and sales questions. It breaks down a goal and produces a summary, findings, action suggestions, and reusable deliverables.
ai-article
A Chinese-language assistant for turning source material into article and content-operation deliverables. It is aimed at creators, marketers, technical teams, and media publishers.
ai-brand-voice-review
A business-diagnosis assistant for marketing, operations, services, and sales questions.
ai-browser-use
A business-diagnosis assistant for marketing, operations, product, and sales questions about how to approach a task.
ai-content-material-audit
A Chinese-language copy-review assistant for creators, marketers, operators, and media teams.