Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Lifecycle-Innovations-Limited/claude-ops/plugin install opsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lifecycle-innovations-limited/claude-ops/ops-competitors)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lifecycle-innovations-limited/claude-ops/ops-competitors"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lifecycle-innovations-limited/claude-ops/ops-competitors/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lifecycle-innovations-limited/claude-ops/ops-competitors"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lifecycle-innovations-limited/claude-ops/ops-competitors.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01463 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00732 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00293 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00146 |
Grade A, and why
ops-competitors scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 182 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Runtime Context
Before rendering, load competitor context:
PLUGIN_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(dirname $(which ops-competitors 2>/dev/null) 2>/dev/null)/..}"
OPS_DATA_DIR="${OPS_DATA_DIR:-$HOME/.claude/plugins/data/ops-ops-marketplace}"
source "$PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/lib/competitor/context.sh" 2>/dev/null || true
CTX=$(competitor_context 2>/dev/null || echo '{"configured":false,"reason":"lib_not_found"}')
OPS ► COMPETITORS — Intel Dashboard
Load ops-rules before acting. Public repo (no personal data). Outbound: one draft → one approval → one send. If AskUserQuestion / Workflow are missing, follow Rule 10 in ops-rules (Hermes: numbered options / two-turn Telegram card; delegate_task).
Parse $ARGUMENTS and dispatch to the matching mode below.
Mode: No args — Dashboard
Show all tracked brands with last_run, alert counts, and recent activity. Use competitor_briefing_line for each brand row.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
OPS ► COMPETITORS — [date]
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
TRACKED BRANDS ([n] total)
[brand] last run [date] [n] alerts · [n] med · [n] low
...
PENDING QUEUES
immediate: [n] daily: [n]
RECENT HIGH ALERTS (last 7d)
[timestamp] [brand] [competitor] [snippet…]
...
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
If configured == false: print setup hint and stop.
# Load context
source "$PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/lib/competitor/context.sh"
competitor_context --window-days 7
competitor_briefing_line
Mobile mode (Rule 7): one line per brand, no banner, no box-drawing.
Mode: <brand-name> — Drill-down
Full event timeline (last 30d), top competitors, latest report, per-competitor signal breakdown.
- Run
competitor_context --brand "<brand>" --window-days 30 - Print brand metadata: category, competitor list, last_run, last_discovery
- Print per-competitor signal breakdown (group events by
.competitor) - Read latest report:
SLUG=$(echo "<brand>" | tr '[:upper:] /' '[:lower:]--' | tr -cd 'a-z0-9-_.') REPORT="$OPS_DATA_DIR/reports/competitor-intel/latest-${SLUG}.md" [[ -f "$REPORT" ]] && head -80 "$REPORT" - Print full high-severity event timeline sorted newest-first
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 182 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A b65bb677f36d
ops-competitors is a skill published in the GitHub repository Lifecycle-Innovations-Limited/claude-ops (187 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,463 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
abm-campaign-builder
Builds targeted Account-Based Marketing campaigns by identifying ideal customer profiles, mapping buying committees, creating personalized outreach sequences, and designing multi-channel engagement strategies. Use when targeting enterprise accounts, building sales playbooks, or designing vertical market penetration…
budget-planning-assistant
Builds annual operating budgets, departmental budgets, and project budgets. Guides through revenue forecasting, expense categorization, variance analysis, and scenario planning for small to mid-size businesses.
business-roi-analyzer
Calculates ROI, payback period, and financial projections for business investments including technology purchases, automation projects, hiring decisions, and equipment acquisitions. Use when evaluating whether a business investment is worth making, comparing multiple investment options, or building a business case for…
change-management-planner
Plans organizational change initiatives including technology rollouts, process redesigns, and team restructuring. Maps stakeholders, identifies resistance, designs communication plans, and builds adoption strategies with measurable milestones.
client-discovery-interview
Conducts structured discovery interviews for consultants, agencies, and service providers. Guides conversation through problem identification, stakeholder mapping, success criteria definition, budget/timeline scoping, and produces a formatted discovery brief with next steps.
cognify-workflow-analysis
Analyzes business workflows to identify automation opportunities, calculate ROI, and generate structured redesign recommendations. Use when a user describes operational pain points, wants to reduce manual work, improve team communication, automate repetitive tasks, or evaluate where AI can save time and money.