Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/light0305/light-skills/light-data-engineeringnpx skills add Light0305/Light-skills --skill light-data-engineeringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Light0305/Light-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/light0305/light-skills/light-data-engineering)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/light0305/light-skills/light-data-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/light0305/light-skills/light-data-engineering.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00361 | $0.09025 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00180 | $0.04512 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00072 | $0.01805 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00903 |
Grade A, and why
light-data-engineering scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 308 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
数据工程(data-engineering)—— 找数据、核数据、守泄漏,再决定 idea 能不能立
你是 Light 科研流水线的 DAG 第 2 节点。任务不是"先把数据洗干净再说",是在提 idea 之前回答院士会枪毙 idea 的 两个硬问题:这数据够不够支撑这个研究(规模/质量/功效)? 和 这套划分有没有藏着让结果虚高的数据泄漏? 数据 不足以支撑的 idea 拦在定稿前(带"缺口 + 补法"回 idea-generation,回边 2⊣3);数据泄漏(顶会拒稿高频雷)是 critical 一票否决。
一句话定位:把"一屋子做数据的院士在提 idea 前真正坚持的"——先找得到、下载得起、许可用得了且版本锁得住, 再做数据可行性前置(很多 idea 死在数据根本不够/不可得/质量差)+ 数据泄漏前置查(标准化早于划分 / 时序穿越 / train-test 实体重叠 / 目标编码穿越)+ 可挖掘价值判断 + 自建数据集规范——落成 下载前 advisory + 确定性 critical 门。深度对标真相源 =
docs/competitors/data-engineering.md(11 个真同类 + 机制锚 + 诚实边界)。谁产 findings、谁是 critical 门(诚实分工):本技能产两类 critical findings(producer=data-engineering)—— ① 数据泄漏(
split_leakage.py→leak_findings.json,HIGH=critical);② 数据可行性不足/idea-killing (data_feasibility_gate.py,功效粗筛 insufficient / 四问 insufficient = critical)。均被run_checkpoint --stage 2聚合 → critical fail exit 1。warn 不阻断:样本量偏紧、划分不合理(spec §4.2 口径)。特殊位置(前置于 idea):data-engineering 是 stage 2,但工作流里常在 idea 之后跑(idea-generation 立项卡先点名 "要什么数据")→ 本技能判"数据撑不撑得起这 idea",不够则
reroute --stage 2建议回边 2⊣3(拦在 idea 前:补数据 / 改 idea 降数据门槛)。这是 idea-generation 立项卡"数据可行性必答字段"的前置守门方。是横切常驻吗? 否。这是按需
/调用的主线节点;file-reading(读数据文件)/memory-pm(记台账)/consistency/ research-ethics(隐私合规复核)全程横切常驻,本技能不重复它们。
何时启动(触发信号)
- 用户给了数据/数据集问"能不能做研究 / 够不够 / 质量行不行 / 怎么划分 / 会不会泄漏"——任一即启动。
- 用户问"哪里有数据 / 这个数据集能不能下载和发表 / HF、OpenML、UCI、Kaggle 该选哪个"——启动数据需求卡与
references/data-resource-map.md的 intake 闭环。 - 作为流水线第 2 步:idea-generation 立项卡点名"这 idea 要 X 数据、规模 N、标注 K" → 本技能判数据可行性,
verdict 强制回写总控(
run_checkpoint --stage 2);数据泄漏 / idea-killing 不足 → critical fail 确定性阻断。 - 数据不足以支撑的 idea:带"缺口 + 补法(补数据 / 改 idea 降门槛)"回 idea-generation(2⊣3 前置回边)——这是决策点,停下问用户。
- 回边(实验阶段,来自 research-plan stage 5):接派生数据规格 →
derive_eval_set.py出鲁棒性/泛化/敏感性评测集。
你怎么工作:ACT / ASK / NEVER
What ships with it
21 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/data_card_template.md 5.0 KB
- examples/derive_spec.example.json 895 B
- examples/rules.example.yaml 975 B
- examples/worked_example.md 7.4 KB
- references.md 22 KB
- references/data-resource-map.md 11 KB
- scripts/check_access_level.py 5.7 KB runs code
- scripts/croissant_export.py 6.8 KB runs code
- scripts/data_doctor.py 22 KB runs code
- scripts/data_feasibility_gate.py 20 KB runs code
- scripts/data_feasibility.py 9.6 KB runs code
- scripts/data_identity_fitness.py 40 KB runs code
- scripts/dataset_intake.py 17 KB runs code
- scripts/derive_eval_set.py 9.3 KB runs code
- scripts/drift_check.py 10 KB runs code
- scripts/quality_gate.py 11 KB runs code
- scripts/safe_split.py 13 KB runs code
- scripts/sample_size_check.py 9.1 KB runs code
- scripts/split_leakage.py 25 KB runs code
- templates/annotation_guide.md 4.7 KB
- templates/data-identity-fitness.example.json 1.9 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 308 lines · 361 tokens per session scan A 11c326e2e246
light-data-engineering is a skill published in the GitHub repository Light0305/Light-skills (581 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 361 tokens to every session and 9,025 once invoked, about $0.0018 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-writing
Research paper writing assistant that enforces Arpit Gupta's editorial principles, voice profile, and writing workflow. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: Use this skill whenever the user mentions writing a paper, drafting a section, revising a section, editing a paper, reviewing a draft, rewriting an introduction, writing an…
research-writing
科研论文写作助手,提供 30 个 Prompt 模板覆盖论文写作全流程。 当用户提到:论文写作、润色、翻译、文献综述、摘要、引言、方法章节、回复审稿人、 基金申请、研究计划、学术演讲 PPT、LaTeX 编辑、学术图表、实验结果分析、模拟审稿、 去 AI 味、文献对比、找研究空白、论文大纲时使用。 不要用于:非学术写作、创意写作、博客、商业文案、求职信、小说等场景。.
anti-defensive-writing-en
Stops defensive writing across the entire paper lifecycle — writing, revising, cutting, and organizing experiments. Treats the paper as a press conference, not a project summary, lab log, or self-audit: identify the single most publishable strength of the work and build the most favorable, complete, and persuasive…
anti-defensive-writing
论文写作、修改、压缩和实验组织全流程中阻止【防御性写作】。把论文视为一场学术发布会, 而不是项目总结、实验日志或自我审查报告:识别这项工作最值得发表的价值,围绕它建立 最有利、最完整、最有说服力的叙事。不平均展示、不主动示弱、不写实验流水账、不替审稿人 攻击自己。 触发词:论文润色、论文修改、写摘要、写引言、写结论、压缩论文、rebuttal、回复审稿意见、 组织实验、论文AI味、防御性写作、心虚。.
academic-paper-writing-skill
Evidence-first academic research workflow for topic ideation, scholarly search, paper reading, literature and systematic reviews, study and experiment design, statistics and data analysis, scientific figures, manuscript drafting and polishing, citation checks, peer review, rebuttals, submission packages, theses, and…
ml-paper-writing
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, reviewer guidelines, and citation verification workflows.