Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Light0305/Light-skills --skill light-patent-disclosuregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Light0305/Light-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/light0305/light-skills/light-patent-disclosure)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/light0305/light-skills/light-patent-disclosure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/light0305/light-skills/light-patent-disclosure/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/light0305/light-skills/light-patent-disclosure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/light0305/light-skills/light-patent-disclosure.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00126 | $0.01738 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.00869 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00348 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00174 |
Grade A, and why
light-patent-disclosure scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 187 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Patent disclosure handoff
Turn a real project or research result into an attorney-reviewable invention disclosure packet: what problem is solved, what technical means solve it, why it differs from nearby work, what embodiments support the breadth, what figures are needed, and what counsel still needs to decide.
Read
references/patent-resource-map.md
before jurisdiction- or filing-sensitive work. It records the peer skills,
official sources, borrowed mechanisms and honest boundaries.
Read
references/patent-interview-and-search.md
before patent-point mining, public search, claim-ladder drafting or attorney
handoff. It contains the detailed interview, search and QC rules.
Non-negotiable boundaries
- This skill is not legal advice and never certifies
READY_TO_FILE. Deliver onlyDRAFT,NEEDS_USER_INPUT, orREADY_FOR_ATTORNEY_REVIEW. - Do not guarantee grant, novelty, inventive step, non-infringement, validity, ownership, freedom to operate, or registration outcome.
- Preserve uncertainty. If a search, date, assignee, inventor, public
disclosure, foreign-filing rule, or priority fact is not verified, write
UNKNOWN,PLANNED, orUNAVAILABLEwith the next check. - Evidence comes from real artifacts: repository files, design docs, lab notes, papers, experiment logs, issue discussions or user-supplied records. Keep relative locators and SHA-256. Do not invent implementation details.
- Patent figures must be programmatic/vector/manual sources such as Mermaid, Graphviz, PlantUML or SVG. Do not use AI-generated bitmap images for patent drawings.
- Keep the skill off the research DAG. It has no stage, no
STAGE_GATES, noROUTES, nolight.findings.v1, and no scientific back-edge.
Workflow
1. Intake the decision facts and risk triage
Ask for or mark UNKNOWN:
- jurisdiction and intended route: CN invention/utility model, US provisional, US nonprovisional, PCT, EP, or undecided;
- owner/applicant, inventors/contributors, employment or sponsor constraints;
- public disclosures, papers, demos, GitHub releases, sales, thesis defense, posters, standards submissions, and their dates;
- deadline, prior filings, priority claim, secrecy/export/confidentiality risk;
- whether a licensed attorney or patent agent will review the output.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 187 lines · 126 tokens per session scan A 20b994edcaa7
light-patent-disclosure is a skill published in the GitHub repository Light0305/Light-skills (618 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 126 tokens to every session and 1,738 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ml-paper-writing
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, reviewer guidelines, and citation verification workflows.
foia-requests
FOIA and public records workflows. Use when drafting requests, tracking submissions, checking exemptions, or appealing denials.
content-access
Legal methods for paywalled and geo-blocked content. Use for paywalls, academic papers, or open access via Unpaywall.
web-archiving
Web archiving and retrieval via Wayback Machine and Archive.today. Use to preserve content, reach dead pages, or save evidence.
brazil-records-requests
Public records requests under Brazil's Access to Information Law (LAI). Use for Fala.BR filings, e-SIC, and CGU/CMRI appeals.
interview-prep
Interview preparation and recording-consent law. Use for research, question frameworks, one-party or all-party consent rules.