lime-quality-workflow

lime-quality-workflow is a skill for Codex from limecloud/lime. It costs 63 tokens per session (1,229 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A set of validation rules for the Lime project. It selects appropriate checks for changes involving the graphical interface, commands or bridges, configuration, versions, and pull-request readiness.

In plain words
What is it for?
Choosing validation commands before submitting Lime changes, including interface, command, configuration, and release-readiness work.
Why use it?
It helps developers run checks that match the kind of change they made instead of relying on one generic test process.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: installed under .codex/.

Good fit Choosing validation commands before submitting Lime changes, including interface, command, configuration, and release-readiness work.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/limecloud/lime/lime-quality-workflow
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add limecloud/lime --skill lime-quality-workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/limecloud/lime

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for lime-quality-workflow

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/limecloud/lime/lime-quality-workflow/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/limecloud/lime/lime-quality-workflow)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/limecloud/lime/lime-quality-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/limecloud/lime/lime-quality-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for lime-quality-workflow

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/limecloud/lime/lime-quality-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/limecloud/lime/lime-quality-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 63 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,229 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00063 $0.01229
Opus 5.5 $0.00025 $0.00492
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00246
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00123

Measured 2d ago against content hash f79cd31f374d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

lime-quality-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.codex/skills/lime-quality-workflow/SKILL.md · 47 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago Changed · -143 lines · +37 tokens per session f79cd31f374d
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 190 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 06940e08479d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

lime-quality-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository limecloud/lime (1,486 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,229 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

relay-80-100-workflow

Use when writing agent-relay workflows that must fully validate features end-to-end before merging. Covers the 80-to-100 pattern - going beyond "code compiles" to "feature works, tested E2E locally." Includes repair-before-failure validation gates, review-depth fresh-eyes review/fix loops with test hardening, PGlite…

AgentWorkforce/relay · 115 tokens

browser-testing-with-screenshots

Use when testing web applications with visual verification - automates Chrome browser interactions, element selection, and screenshot capture for confirming UI functionality.

AgentWorkforce/relay · 32 tokens

engineering-workflow

A Chinese-language workflow for reliable software development. It describes exploring the problem, making a plan, using TDD (test-driven development, where tests are written before the code), debugging methodically, reviewing code, and verifying the result.

TencentCloud/Octop · 47 tokens

agent-evaluation

Run one specified Test Agent on one specified Benchmark Case exactly once, privately score that execution, and return one protocol result.

Prism-Shadow/penguin-harness · 28 tokens

agent-optimization

Improve an Agent State through versioned scores and score-linked Traces from a frozen Benchmark.

Prism-Shadow/penguin-harness · 22 tokens

nexent-daily-test

A procedure for running Nexent daily, full-layer tests on a self-hosted Ubuntu machine. Nexent is tested across separate layers such as unit, service, AI runtime, and browser journeys, with results and evidence kept locally.

ModelEngine-Group/nexent · 78 tokens