Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lingxling/awesome-skills-cn --skill address-github-commentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lingxling/awesome-skills-cnWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lingxling/awesome-skills-cn/address-github-comments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lingxling/awesome-skills-cn/address-github-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lingxling/awesome-skills-cn/address-github-comments.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00381 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00191 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00076 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
address-github-comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
98% identical to address-github-comments — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Address GitHub Comments
Overview
Efficiently address PR review comments or issue feedback using the GitHub CLI (gh). This skill ensures all feedback is addressed systematically.
Prerequisites
Ensure gh is authenticated.
gh auth status
If not logged in, run gh auth login.
Workflow
1. Inspect Comments
Fetch the comments for the current branch's PR.
gh pr view --comments
Or use a custom script if available to list threads.
2. Categorize and Plan
- List the comments and review threads.
- Propose a fix for each.
- Wait for user confirmation on which comments to address first if there are many.
3. Apply Fixes
Apply the code changes for the selected comments.
4. Respond to Comments
Once fixed, respond to the threads as resolved.
gh pr comment <PR_NUMBER> --body "Addressed in latest commit."
Common Mistakes
- Applying fixes without understanding context: Always read the surrounding code of a comment.
- Not verifying auth: Check
gh auth statusbefore starting.
When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 67 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 463a2a0f2720
address-github-comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository lingxling/awesome-skills-cn (274 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 381 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 98% identical to address-github-comments, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit-pr
Audit a whole PR against the delivery contract and return MERGE-READY or evidenced blockers with the full URL. Consumes the current review-change REVIEW-PASS receipt instead of re-running review axes; posts a SHA-bound ready comment; never edits or merges. Triggers: "audit-pr", "is this PR ready", "merge gate".
review-gate
HARD GATE before PR creation - verifies review artifact exists in issue comments, all findings addressed or tracked, blocks PR creation if requirements not met.
pr-review
Review open PRs two ways - default is a per-PR deep review with severity-tagged findings, inline comments, and a verdict; --survey runs a risk-tiered triage digest of what's safe to merge first.
pr-triage
First-touch triage for external pull requests - verdict, label, and a welcoming comment within minutes of open.
pre-publish-review
Nuclear-grade 12-agent pre-publish release gate. Runs /get-unpublished-changes to detect all changes since last npm release, spawns up to 10 ultrabrain agents for deep per-change analysis, invokes /review-work (orchestrator manual QA plus one gate reviewer) for holistic review, and 1 oracle for overall release…
work-with-pr
Full PR lifecycle in a fresh task-owned git worktree: implement via the ulw-loop skill with mandatory evidence-bound manual QA → reviewer-readable English PR → verification loop (CI + Cubic, where Cubic is skipped only when its quota is exhausted) → merge by default → worktree cleanup. Decomposes one task into the…