Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lingxling/awesome-skills-cn --skill agentic-actions-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lingxling/awesome-skills-cnWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lingxling/awesome-skills-cn/agentic-actions-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lingxling/awesome-skills-cn/agentic-actions-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lingxling/awesome-skills-cn/agentic-actions-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lingxling/awesome-skills-cn/agentic-actions-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lingxling/awesome-skills-cn/agentic-actions-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.04700 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.01880 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00940 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00470 |
Grade A, and why
agentic-actions-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
98% identical to agentic-actions-auditor — 60 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 344 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agentic Actions Auditor
Static security analysis guidance for GitHub Actions workflows that invoke AI coding agents. This skill teaches you how to discover workflow files locally or from remote GitHub repositories, identify AI action steps, follow cross-file references to composite actions and reusable workflows that may contain hidden AI agents, capture security-relevant configuration, and detect attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches an AI agent running in a CI/CD pipeline.
When to Use
- Auditing a repository's GitHub Actions workflows for AI agent security
- Reviewing CI/CD configurations that invoke Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, or OpenAI Codex
- Checking whether attacker-controlled input can reach AI agent prompts
- Evaluating agentic action configurations (sandbox settings, tool permissions, user allowlists)
- Assessing trigger events that expose workflows to external input (
pull_request_target,issue_comment, etc.) - Investigating data flow from GitHub event context through
env:blocks to AI prompt fields
When NOT to Use
- Analyzing workflows that do NOT use any AI agent actions (use general Actions security tools instead)
- Reviewing standalone composite actions or reusable workflows outside of a caller workflow context (use this skill when analyzing a workflow that references them via
uses:) - Performing runtime prompt injection testing (this is static analysis guidance, not exploitation)
- Auditing non-GitHub CI/CD systems (Jenkins, GitLab CI, CircleCI)
- Auto-fixing or modifying workflow files (this skill reports findings, does not modify files)
Rationalizations to Reject
When auditing agentic actions, reject these common rationalizations. Each represents a reasoning shortcut that leads to missed findings.
1. "It only runs on PRs from maintainers"
Wrong because it ignores pull_request_target, issue_comment, and other trigger events that expose actions to external input. Attackers do not need write access to trigger these workflows. A pull_request_target event runs in the context of the base branch, not the PR branch, meaning any external contributor can trigger it by opening a PR.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago First seen · 344 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A cd36ee2f0e65
agentic-actions-auditor is a skill published in the GitHub repository lingxling/awesome-skills-cn (317 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 4,700 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 98% identical to agentic-actions-auditor, differing in 60 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
cicd-pipelines
CI/CD pipeline design and DevOps automation — use when the user mentions GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, Terraform, infrastructure as code, DevSecOps, ArgoCD, Kubernetes deployment automation, or pipeline configuration YAML. NOT for release orchestration or semantic-release workflows (use git-workflow), NOT for…
ci-cd-and-automation
Automates CI/CD pipeline setup. Use when setting up or modifying build and deployment pipelines. Use when you need to automate quality gates, configure test runners in CI, or establish deployment strategies.
simp
A relationship-advice skill that helps interpret signals, plan respectful approaches, and write sincere messages for someone you like.
bitbucket-workflow
Bitbucket best practices for pull requests, Pipelines CI/CD, Jira integration, and Atlassian ecosystem workflows.
github-actions-expert
Expert guide for GitHub Actions CI/CD workflows, reusable workflows, composite actions, matrix builds, OIDC cloud auth, security hardening, and artifact automation / Panduan ahli GitHub Actions CI/CD workflows, reusable workflows, aksi komposit, autentikasi cloud OIDC, pengerasan keamanan, dan otomasi rilis.
ci-cd-devops-architect
Expert guide for continuous integration, deployment pipelines, Docker, Kubernetes, and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) / Panduan ahli untuk CI/CD dan infrastruktur.