Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add linhnguyen-gt/Routiform --skill routiform-codex-setupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/linhnguyen-gt/RoutiformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/linhnguyen-gt/routiform/routiform-codex-setup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linhnguyen-gt/routiform/routiform-codex-setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linhnguyen-gt/routiform/routiform-codex-setup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linhnguyen-gt/routiform/routiform-codex-setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linhnguyen-gt/routiform/routiform-codex-setup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.00913 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00047 | $0.00456 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00183 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00091 |
Grade B, and why
routiform-codex-setup scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
description: "Point the OpenAI Codex CLI at a running Routiform gateway by adding a model_providers entry to ~/.codex/config.toml, so codex requests route through Routiform's /v1/responses surface with failover and loggi Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
`curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' http://localhost:20128/v1/models` → `200`. This is a copy
86% identical to explain-issue — 98 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Connect OpenAI Codex CLI to Routiform
Codex reads providers from ~/.codex/config.toml. Routiform serves the Responses API at
/v1/responses, which is the wire protocol Codex expects.
Prerequisites
- Routiform running and reachable. Default:
http://localhost:20128. Confirm withcurl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' http://localhost:20128/v1/models→200. - At least one provider connection configured at
/dashboard/providers. - Codex installed:
npm install -g @openai/codex.
Steps
1. Create a gateway API key — Routiform's own, not a provider key. Dashboard → API Manager, or:
routiform key create codex
2. Add the provider to ~/.codex/config.toml. This is the exact block Routiform's own CLI Tools
page writes, so it stays compatible with the dashboard's detect-and-apply flow:
model = "openai/gpt-5"
model_provider = "routiform"
[model_providers.routiform]
name = "Routiform"
base_url = "http://localhost:20128/v1"
wire_api = "responses"
base_url does carry /v1 here — unlike Claude Code, Codex appends only the endpoint path.
3. Give Codex the key. With no env_key in the provider block, Codex reads OPENAI_API_KEY:
export OPENAI_API_KEY="sk-your-routiform-key"
4. Pick a model that exists. model must be an id Routiform can resolve — list them with
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENAI_API_KEY" http://localhost:20128/v1/models, or point it at a
combo. A bare auto is rejected: Routiform answers
Ambiguous model 'auto'. Use provider/model prefix (ex: qd/auto or kr/auto).
For a remote Routiform, replace localhost:20128 with the host and use https://.
Verify
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENAI_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"openai/gpt-5","input":"ping"}' \
http://localhost:20128/v1/responses
200 means the surface Codex uses is working end to end. Then run codex "what is 2+2?" and check
/dashboard/logs — the entry appearing there is the proof it routed through Routiform rather than
straight to OpenAI.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 80 lines · 94 tokens per session scan B 380886b6d123
routiform-codex-setup is a skill published in the GitHub repository linhnguyen-gt/Routiform (12 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 913 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (reads agent configuration directories, makes network calls). It is 86% identical to explain-issue, differing in 98 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…