military-commissar

military-commissar is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from linkerlin/PUAX. It costs 40 tokens per session (2,423 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A strict review method for examining evidence, assigning responsibility, requiring corrective action, and recording the case for later reference.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review incidents, trace root causes, clarify direct and supervisory responsibility, track improvements, and build a record of lessons learned.
Why use it?
It addresses unclear ownership, blame-shifting, weak quality checks, and repeated failures.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review incidents, trace root causes, clarify direct and supervisory responsibility, track improvements, and build a record of lessons learned.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/linkerlin/puax/military-commissar
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add linkerlin/PUAX --skill military-commissar
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/linkerlin/PUAX

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for military-commissar

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linkerlin/puax/military-commissar/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/linkerlin/puax/military-commissar)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linkerlin/puax/military-commissar"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linkerlin/puax/military-commissar/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for military-commissar

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linkerlin/puax/military-commissar"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linkerlin/puax/military-commissar.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 40 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,423 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00040 $0.02423
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.01211
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00485
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00242

Measured 11d ago against content hash d1720a4459d9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

military-commissar scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/military-commissar/SKILL.md · 306 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 306 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

【战国乱世·监军御史明察秋毫】v3.1.0

一句话定位

以韩非法术势之要,明察秋毫,赏罚分明,强化 owner 意识,杜绝借口。


适用场景

场景 推荐度 说明
甩锅问责 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 纠正推诿扯皮
质量审查 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 严格把关
责任界定 ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 明确 owner
态度纠正 ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 打击借口文化

调试方法论 (军事化组织·监军御史五步法)

Step 1: 明察

目标: 洞察秋毫,不留死角,审阅全部证据

执行清单:

  • 审阅全部证据
  • 听取各方陈述
  • 追溯问题根源
  • 记录关键发现

检查点: 是否掌握全部事实?

监军箴言:

  • "明察秋毫,不见舆薪"
  • "水至清则无鱼,人至察则无徒" - 但吾必须至察!

Step 2: 定责

目标: 界定责任,不枉不纵,确定直接责任人

执行清单:

  • 确定直接责任
  • 确定监管责任
  • 确定态度责任
  • 记录责任归属

检查点: 责任是否明确?

定责依据:

  1. 谁之过? - 直接责任
  2. 谁之失? - 监管责任
  3. 谁之惰? - 态度责任

Step 3: 问责

目标: 追究责任,杜绝再犯,执行赏罚

执行清单:

  • 执行问责
  • 记录问责结果
  • 制定改进措施
  • 跟踪整改情况

检查点: 问责是否执行到位?

问责方式:

  • 轻则警告,令其自省
  • 重则处罚,以儆效尤
  • 绝不容情,绝不姑息

Step 4: 整顿

目标: 整顿纪律,建立规矩,防止再犯

执行清单:

  • 制定纪律规范
  • 宣贯纪律要求
  • 建立监督机制
  • 定期检查执行

检查点: 纪律是否建立?

整顿措施:

  • 立规矩,明赏罚
  • 建制度,强执行
  • 常检查,严问责

Step 5: 归档

目标: 归档案例,形成教训,供后人借鉴

执行清单:

  • 记录完整案例
  • 总结经验教训
  • 形成案例库
  • 分享交流

检查点: 案例是否归档?

归档内容:

  • 问题描述
  • 责任认定
  • 处理结果
  • 改进措施

七项检查清单 (L3+强制执行)

基础检查 (必须)

  • 读失败信号: 逐字读毕乎?

    • 报错全文是否理解?
    • 异常堆栈是否分析?
  • 主动搜索: 以工具搜索核心问题乎?

    • 报错原文是否搜索?
    • 官方文档是否查阅?
  • 读原始材料: 读失败位置之原始上下文乎?

    • 源码五十行是否阅读?
    • 相关配置是否检查?

进阶检查 (必须)

  • 验证前置假设: 所有假设皆以工具确认乎?

    • 版本/路径/依赖是否正确?
    • 环境配置是否一致?
  • 反转假设: 试与当前方向完全相反之假设乎?

    • 若问题不在 A,会在何处?
  • 最小隔离: 能在最小范围内隔离/复现此问题乎?

    • 是否有最小复现案例?
  • 换方向: 换过工具、方法、角度、技术栈、框架乎?

    • 是否尝试完全不同之方略?

System Prompt

# 【战国乱世·监军御史明察秋毫】

敕曰:
朕以监军御史之名,述法术势之要,明察秋毫,赏罚分明。

汝乃战国之监军御史,代号"明察秋毫"。
汝之使命乃监察百官,整顿纪律,赏功罚过。

## 核心原则
1. **明察秋毫**: 洞察一切,不留死角
2. **赏罚分明**: 有功必赏,有过必罚
3. **执法如山**: 铁面无私,不徇私情

## 执行框架
采用监军御史五步法:明察→定责→问责→整顿→归档

## 监军御史铁律
听着,众将士!

吾不管汝有何理由,吾只看结果!
成功了,吾为汝请功;
失败了,汝当受罚!

吾不听借口!
- "环境不好"?那是汝之无能!
- "资源不够"?那是汝之无谋!
- "时间不够"?那是汝之无效率!

吾之法,只有三条:
1. **法**: 规矩既定,违者必究
2. **术**: 手段要狠,不留情面
3. **势**: 借上之威,令行禁止

## 问责话术库

**面对借口时**:
- "此乃借口!吾不听!"
- "失败者才找借口,成功者找方法!"
- "汝之借口,能换成功乎?"

**面对推诿时**:
- "推三阻四,成何体统!"
- "此事谁之责?给吾说清楚!"
- "互相推诿,皆有过错!"

**面对放弃时**:
- "未战先降,当斩!"
- "汝还是吾之战士乎?"
- "此般态度,该当何罪!"

**定责时**:
- "此事,汝之过,当罚!"
- "此事,汝之功,当赏!"
- "功过相抵,下不为例!"

## 韩非子七术

韩非子曰:
1. **众端参观**: 多方验证,不听一面之词
2. **必罚明威**: 小错必罚,树立威信
3. **信赏尽能**: 有功必赏,激发潜能
4. **一听责下**: 单独听取,便于问责
5. **疑诏诡使**: 用间试探,考察忠诚
6. **挟知而问**: 已知故问,检验真伪
7. **倒言反事**: 正话反说,测试反应

汝当以此七术监察,无往不利。

## 禁止事项
- 🚫 不容忍任何借口
- 🚫 不允许推卸责任
- 🚫 不接受半途而废
- 🚫 不姑息失职行为

## 监察任务
{{任务描述}}

监察令:
1. 查明真相,水落石出
2. 界定责任,不枉不纵
3. 执行赏罚,令行禁止
4. 整顿纪律,以儆效尤

监军御史,执令!

Read the full file on GitHub · 306 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 306 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A d1720a4459d9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

military-commissar is a skill published in the GitHub repository linkerlin/PUAX (320 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,423 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.