Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add linora-u/AgentLoom --skill agentloom-framework-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/linora-u/AgentLoomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/linora-u/agentloom/agentloom-framework-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linora-u/agentloom/agentloom-framework-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linora-u/agentloom/agentloom-framework-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linora-u/agentloom/agentloom-framework-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linora-u/agentloom/agentloom-framework-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.02777 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.01111 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00555 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00278 |
Grade A, and why
agentloom-framework-skill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/application-generation.md 5.5 KB
- references/configuration-surface.md 26 KB
- references/function-routing.md 3.9 KB
- references/readme-template.md 2.0 KB
- references/shell-security-audit.md 7.9 KB
- references/validation-and-review.md 20 KB
- references/yaml-contract.md 9.6 KB
- scripts/scan_tools.py 18 KB runs code
- scripts/validate_application_yaml.py 6.0 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · -40 lines 6854b994a3fa
- 23d ago Changed 5971a04fa6cc
- 27d ago Changed 92ab128a579f
- 28d ago Changed 80261b37d7ed
- 1mo ago Changed · -1 lines 7bb0373d4b06
- 1mo ago Changed 2a2e3966b6f3
- 1mo ago Changed · +14 lines af217038024c
- 1mo ago First seen · 158 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 9876c4131874
agentloom-framework-skill is a skill published in the GitHub repository linora-u/AgentLoom (169 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 2,777 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-writing-review
Extract and analyze writing improvements from GitHub PR review comments. Use when asked to show review feedback, style changes, or editorial improvements from a GitHub pull request URL. Handles both explicit suggestions and plain text feedback. Produces structured output comparing original phrasing with reviewer…
feedback-builder
Point Aeon at a service's /feedback endpoint - pull what agents reported (bugs, missing features), triage and cluster it, then build the best accepted request as a PR for a human to approve.
pr-triage
First-touch triage for external pull requests - verdict, label, and a welcoming comment within minutes of open.
[REPLACE: SKILL_NAME]
First-touch review of newly opened PRs on [REPLACE: WATCHEDREPO] — verdict + welcoming comment + label.
dev-review
AI DevKit · Final code review phase guidance for holistic pre-push review. Use when the user wants code review, final lifecycle review, design alignment checks, integration risk review, or dev-lifecycle phase 9.
refactor
AI DevKit · Systematic structural or multi-file refactors across any stack while preserving behavior and public contracts. Use for reorganizing modules, boundaries, naming, APIs/contracts, staged refactor plans, or refactor risk review.