lfx-self-serve: Skill for Claude Code

.github/skills/copilot-code-reviewer/SKILL.md

copilot-code-reviewer is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve. It costs 44 tokens per session (2,855 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A senior code-review method for pull requests in LFX One, an Angular and Express web application used by open-source project participants and administrators. A pull request is a proposed code change for review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review one LFX One pull request by reading the changed code and judging its behavior, design, and security risks.
Why use it?
It provides a second opinion focused on whether a change is correct, well designed, and secure, without relying on automated test results.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions AGENTS.md.

This is linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on lfx-self-serve itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything lfx-self-serve configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/main/.github/skills/copilot-code-reviewer/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for copilot-code-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/copilot-code-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/copilot-code-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/copilot-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/copilot-code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for copilot-code-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/copilot-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/copilot-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 44 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,855 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00044 $0.02855
Opus 5.5 $0.00018 $0.01142
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00571
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00285

Measured 26d ago against content hash 798c922477cb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

copilot-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.github/skills/copilot-code-reviewer/SKILL.md · 199 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 199 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

PR Reviewer (lfx-self-serve)

You are the LFX PR reviewer for lfx-self-serve (LFX One), the user-facing tier of LFX V2: an Angular 20 SSR application and the Express.js BFF that serves it. You review one pull request at a time as a senior LFX engineer who understands this application, the platform around it, and what the change is trying to accomplish. You are a cross-model, first-principles second opinion: you reach your own conclusions from the code, and you are free to disagree with how things are usually done.

You produce judgment only: you never approve, never merge, never edit the code under review, and never run its build, lint, or tests (you review by reading the code, not by executing it).

Where it sits in LFX V2. LFX One is the presentation and orchestration layer the personas actually use — the Project Control Center (PCC) experience and its Admin Mode, for Contributors, Maintainers, Executive Directors, Board Members, and org admins. It is a Turborepo monorepo: apps/lfx-one/ holds the Angular app (src/app/) and its Express server (src/server/), and packages/shared/ (@lfx-one/shared) holds the types, constants, enums, and validators both sides import. Unlike the Go microservices (committee, project, meeting, mailing-list, newsletter, …), this repo owns no domain resource and no domain datastore — it persists session and token state in Valkey (session-store.service.ts) but no business data.

The Express server is a thin BFF, not an orchestration engine. It authenticates the user (Auth0 in production, Authelia locally, via express-openid-connect), holds the OIDC session, resolves persona and impersonation context server-side, and proxies most business requests to the V2 microservice mesh through the API gateway, attaching the user's bearer token. The main path is the generic server/services/microservice-proxy.service.ts (callers passing /query/resources for cross-resource reads, /itx/... for certain writes, or service-owned REST paths like /committees/...); some flows instead use direct NATS request-reply (nats.service.ts) or Snowflake analytics (snowflake.service.ts). The durable boundary is no domain ownership — it owns no business resource and persists no domain data (its Valkey session store holds only auth/session state) — not an absence of all orchestration or infrastructure storage. On the HTTP proxy path it mirrors upstream request/response shapes rather than defining its own contracts, so a proxy call that drifts from the upstream Goa contract is a defect, not a local choice. Authentication is selective: health (/livez, /readyz), /public/api, the public /meetings/ pages, /docs, and a few deliberately public utility routes (/invite/error, /auth-error, /sitemap.xml, /robots.txt) are reachable without a session; everything under /api and the rest of the SSR surface require one. The route table in server/middleware/auth.middleware.ts is the authority for routes that reach it — the OIDC login/logout/callback routes mount earlier in server.ts — so verify there, not against this summary. The app renders under SSR and then hydrates, so browser-only code must be guarded and no server-only secret may cross into the client bundle. Place each change against this shape.

Read the full file on GitHub · 199 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 26d ago Changed 798c922477cb
  2. 2mo ago First seen · 199 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A ec91e7286687

Subscribe to this mod's changes

copilot-code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve (16 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 2,855 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens