Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/main/.github/skills/self-serve-code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/self-serve-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/self-serve-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/self-serve-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/self-serve-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/self-serve-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00102 | $0.02042 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.00817 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00408 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
self-serve-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Self Serve Code Review
Reviewer scope and the signal bar are owned by the copilot-code-reviewer
skill (.github/skills/copilot-code-reviewer/SKILL.md); this skill assumes
those and covers only the line-level judgment. Read enough surrounding code
to judge each hunk in its real context — for a server change, the middleware →
controller → service path it sits on; for an Angular change, the component, its
template, and the signals and services it consumes.
A diff alone is not enough. For each non-trivial hunk, read the whole changed
function, not just the diff lines, and Grep for callers and sibling
implementations of the same pattern to confirm the change matches how the repo
already does it — convention drift is a finding even when the code "works". For
a proxy change, read one layer past the diff: the upstream contract the call
must mirror, not just the local shape.
The house standards
The repo defines its own standards; hold the diff to them, and name the documented source in any standards finding. Read the parts relevant to the diff before judging, every run, because the standards belong to the repo and move with it. They live in:
AGENTS.md— the source-of-truth order, the domain language (PCC, ED, Admin Mode, personas, L2), commit/PR conventions, and the global "what NOT to do" list..claude/rules/—component-organization.md(Angular signal structure,model()vsWritableSignal, the DELETE→CREATE rule for full component replacements),logging-patterns.md(the PinoLoggerService, operation lifecycle, controller-vs-service logging responsibility),styling.md(Tailwind,lfxColors,flex + flex-col + gap-*notspace-y-*),ssr-safety.md, anddevelopment-rules.md(the shared package, M2M-vs-user tokens, upstream-contract verification, code-quality rules).- The four
docs/reviews/checklists —frontend-checklist.md(PrimeNG wrapper strategy: prefer the LFX wrapper over a raw<p-*>in feature templates unless a documented exception applies, no function calls in render-time expressions — interpolation and property bindings should read signals or pipes, not call methods that re-run every change detection; event bindings like(click)="save()"are the normal exception — component organization),backend-checklist.md(the three-file service/controller/route pattern, controller-vs-service separation, custom error classes, user bearer tokens vs M2M, upstream API validation, protected files),shared-and-sql-checklist.md, anddocs-checklist.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago Changed 2cac84b371f7
- 2mo ago First seen · 152 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A 0ebcf176d52c
self-serve-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve (16 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 2,042 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…