Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add linxule/interpretive-orchestration --skill literature-sweepgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/linxule/interpretive-orchestrationWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/linxule/interpretive-orchestration/literature-sweep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linxule/interpretive-orchestration/literature-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linxule/interpretive-orchestration/literature-sweep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linxule/interpretive-orchestration/literature-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linxule/interpretive-orchestration/literature-sweep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01204 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00602 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00241 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
literature-sweep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 172 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A ee5d1d83d983
literature-sweep is a skill published in the GitHub repository linxule/interpretive-orchestration (17 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,204 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
rehearse-qa
Simulated-audience Q&A rehearsal for conference talks, thesis defenses, job talks, and poster sessions. Use when a researcher says "rehearse Q&A", "practice questions", "mock Q&A", "grill me on my paper", "what will the audience ask", "hostile questions", "defense practice", "viva prep", "anticipate questions for my…
hps-academic-paper
A review deck on compositional generalization in large language models — the field map, the gap, the evidence, and open questions. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for PI, lab group, reviewers.
html-ppt-zhangzara-vellum
A humanities lecture: how Renaissance linear perspective reshaped early cartography — sources, argument, and evidence. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for faculty, graduate seminar.
kaggle-learner
This skill should be used when the user asks to "learn from Kaggle", "study Kaggle solutions", "analyze Kaggle competitions", or mentions Kaggle competition URLs. Provides access to extracted knowledge from winning Kaggle solutions across NLP, CV, time series, tabular, and multimodal domains.
acl-review-process
Use when reasoning about how an ACL paper travels through ACL Rolling Review and conference commitment, covering reviewer and area-chair roles, meta-reviews, the commitment decision by senior area chairs and program chairs, Findings versus main-conference outcomes, ethics review escalation, and resubmission strategy…
keshav-three-pass
Tactic: Read one paper by Keshav's three-pass method — a shallow skim, a contribution-grasping full read, then a deep virtual re-implementation. Use when the goal is understanding a paper rather than extracting a fixed schema.