Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add linyeping/Metis --skill x-researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/linyeping/MetisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/linyeping/metis/x-research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linyeping/metis/x-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linyeping/metis/x-research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/linyeping/metis/x-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/linyeping/metis/x-research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00932 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00466 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
x-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 117 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 1760f715628e
x-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository linyeping/Metis (6 stars, last pushed 13d ago), with no licence file. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 932 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
data-analysis
Analyze, explore, clean, and visualize datasets with statistical rigor. Use when user asks to analyze data, find patterns, compute statistics, create visualizations, clean messy data, or explore a dataset. Trigger when user says things like "analyze this data", "what trends do you see", "find patterns in", "create a…
summarization
Summarize documents, articles, conversations, code, and technical content into concise, accurate summaries. Use when user asks to summarize, condense, create a TL;DR, write an executive summary, extract key points, or distill content. Trigger when user says things like "summarize this", "give me the key points"…
experiment_management
Set up and manage the experiment folder structure. This is Phase 0 — it runs before any analysis begins. All bookkeeping files are JSON (never markdown).
evaluate
Compare baseline and new implementation results. Produce the machine-readable final report result.json, update experiments.json, and append a row to comparison.json.
implement
Create a new Jupyter notebook implementing the method from the research paper, using the same data as the baseline. Record implementation details and measured metrics as a structured JSON entry.
progress
Maintain a machine-readable progress file so dashboards, CLIs, and notebooks can poll the experiment's state at any time. The file is a JSON document — never markdown, never human-prose-first.