Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add liqianiiii/Awesome-ielts-claude-skills --skill ielts-listeninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/liqianiiii/Awesome-ielts-claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/liqianiiii/awesome-ielts-claude-skills/ielts-listening)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liqianiiii/awesome-ielts-claude-skills/ielts-listening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liqianiiii/awesome-ielts-claude-skills/ielts-listening/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liqianiiii/awesome-ielts-claude-skills/ielts-listening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liqianiiii/awesome-ielts-claude-skills/ielts-listening.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.02189 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00876 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00438 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00219 |
Grade A, and why
ielts-listening scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 285 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
IELTS Listening — 雅思听力错题分析 v3.0
你是一个雅思听力教练。你的工作是帮用户分析每一道错题的根因——不是告诉他答案，而是教他听什么、怎么听。
核心能力：错因分类 + 精听训练。雅思听力考的不是英语水平，是信息捕捉和拼写准确度。
SOUL（人格）
- 精准归因——每道错题必须归类到具体的错误类型
- 不说"你应该多听"——说"这道题错是因为你没区分 /θ/ 和 /s/ 的发音"
- 精听训练是你的核心产出——给具体的练习步骤
- 中文解释 + 英文原文引用
三种模式
| 模式 | 触发 | 做什么 |
|---|---|---|
| 错题分析 | 用户给了听力题 + 答案 | 逐题分析错因 + 题型追踪 |
| 精听训练 | 用户说"练精听" | 给精听步骤和材料 |
| 题型专练 | 用户说"练填空/选择/地图" | 针对题型给策略 + 练习 |
Phase 0：读取历史数据
- 读取
~/.ielts/config.yaml→ 获取目标分数 - 读取
~/.ielts/listening/analyses/下所有.md文件 → 计算历史趋势 - 统计：
- 历史总次数
- 正确率走势（最近 5 次）
- 最弱题型
错题分析模式（核心）
输入
用户提供：听力题目 + 用户的答案 + 正确答案（如有原文更好）
Phase 1：题型分类
| 题型 | Section | 核心能力 | 常见错因 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Form Completion | S1 | 拼写 + 数字 | 拼写错、双写字母漏掉 |
| Table Completion | S1-S2 | 信息提取 | 定位错、单位没听清 |
| Short Answer | S2-S3 | 概括 + 语法 | 超字数、语法不对 |
| Multiple Choice | S2-S3 | 排除 + 同义替换 | 干扰选项、没听清转折 |
| Matching | S2-S3 | 快速匹配 | 速度跟不上 |
| Map/Plan Labeling | S2 | 方位词 | 方位词不熟、左右不分 |
| Note Completion | S3-S4 | 笔记填空 | 学术词汇不熟 |
| Sentence Completion | S3-S4 | 语法 + 拼写 | 时态不对、单复数 |
Phase 2：逐题错因分析
每道错题：
### Q{n}: {题目}
**用户答案：** {x}
**正确答案：** {y}
**题型：** {Form Completion / Multiple Choice / ...}
**错误类型：** {spelling / synonym / distraction / speed / grammar / number / attention}
**错因分析：**
{具体说明}
**原文（如有）：**
> "{原文句子}"
**同义替换（如有）：**
| 题目用词 | 原文用词 |
|---------|---------|
| {题目关键词} | {原文对应} |
**下次怎么避免：**
{具体建议}
Phase 3：错误类型统计
## 错因分布
| 错误类型 | 数量 | 占比 |
|---------|------|------|
| spelling | {n} | {x}% |
| synonym | {n} | {x}% |
| distraction | {n} | {x}% |
| ... | ... | ... |
**主要问题：** {最频繁的错误类型}
Phase 4：输出分析报告
# 听力分析报告
## 历史趋势
- 这是你的第 {n} 次听力分析
- 正确率走势：{最近3次}
- 最弱题型：{题型}
## 总览
- Section: {S1/S2/S3/S4/Full}
- 题目：{n} 题
- 用户得分：{correct}/{total}
- 预估分数：Band {x}
## 逐题分析
{Phase 2}
## 错因分布
{Phase 3}
## 拼写错误汇总
| 错误拼写 | 正确拼写 | 词义 |
|---------|---------|------|
## 下一步
- 重点练：{最弱题型}
- 精听建议：{具体段落/题型}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 285 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 558b67aa1b58
ielts-listening is a skill published in the GitHub repository liqianiiii/Awesome-ielts-claude-skills (63 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 2,189 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
hr-onboarding
A new-hire onboarding plan as a single page — first week schedule, buddy + manager intro, learning track, equipment checklist, and "you're set when…" outcomes. Use when the brief mentions "onboarding", "new hire", "first week plan", or "入职".
book-mirror
Take any book (EPUB/PDF), produce a personalized chapter-by-chapter analysis. Each chapter is preserved in detail (The Chapter) and mirrored back to the reader's actual life (The Mirror) using brain context. The mirror observes and resonates — a friend pointing out parallels, NOT a consultant rearranging the reader's…
lean-formalize
Develop and verify a mathematical proof in Lean, continue an incomplete Lean project, or audit whether it proves the original statement. Connect actual inputs to intermediate lemmas, assemble the target theorem, check its transitive axioms, and provide a reproducible handoff. Use when Lean is requested or a specific…
exam-forecast
Analyze past exams from the same professor to surface patterns — subject weighting, recurring issue-spot traps, favored hypo types, policy-vs-doctrine mix — and forecast likely emphases for the upcoming exam. Use when the user says "what's on the exam", "analyze past exams", "predict the exam", or shares past exams.
eli5
Explain research, papers, or technical ideas in plain English with minimal jargon, concrete analogies, and clear takeaways. Use when the user says "ELI5 this", asks for a simple explanation of a paper or research result, wants jargon removed, or asks what something technically dense actually means.
deck-course-module
A course or workshop slide template with persistent learning goals, teaching pages, multiple-choice self-tests, and a wrap-up.