Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lisihao/Solar --skill reportgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lisihao/SolarWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lisihao/solar/report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lisihao/solar/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lisihao/solar/report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lisihao/solar/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lisihao/solar/report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.01620 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00810 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00324 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00162 |
Grade A, and why
report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 289 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/report - 技术报告模板
使用
/report full 完整技术报告
/report adr 架构决策记录 (ADR)
/report brief 精简报告
1. 完整技术报告模板 (/report full)
# [项目名称] 技术报告
> 版本: x.x.x | 日期: YYYY-MM-DD | 状态: Draft/Review/Final
---
## Executive Summary
[150-300字概述:目的、方法、关键发现、结论]
---
## 一、背景与愿景
### 1.1 问题陈述
- **业务痛点**: [具体问题描述]
- **技术挑战**: [技术限制/瓶颈]
- **市场机会**: [为什么现在做]
### 1.2 目标与成功标准
| 目标 | 指标 | 基线 | 目标值 |
|------|------|------|--------|
| 性能提升 | 延迟 | 100ms | <50ms |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
### 1.3 范围与约束
- **In Scope**: ...
- **Out of Scope**: ...
- **约束条件**: 时间/预算/技术栈
---
## 二、技术分析
### 2.1 技术趋势
| 趋势 | 影响 | 机会 |
|------|------|------|
| ... | ... | ... |
### 2.2 业界 SOTA (State of the Art)
| 方案 | 性能 | 优势 | 劣势 |
|------|------|------|------|
| 方案A | ... | ... | ... |
| 方案B | ... | ... | ... |
### 2.3 竞品分析
[关键竞品的技术方案对比]
---
## 三、技术决策 (ADR 格式)
### ADR-001: [决策标题]
**Status**: Accepted | Proposed | Deprecated | Superseded
**Context**:
[决策背景和面临的问题]
**Decision**:
[做出的决策]
**Consequences**:
- ✅ 好处: ...
- ⚠️ 代价: ...
- 📋 后续: ...
### ADR-002: ...
---
## 四、实现历程
### 4.1 技术选型与验证
| 候选 | 测试结果 | 结论 |
|------|----------|------|
| 方案A | 延迟 80ms | ❌ 不满足 |
| 方案B | 延迟 45ms | ✅ 采用 |
### 4.2 关键突破
#### 挑战 1: [问题描述]
- **尝试**: [失败的方案]
- **突破**: [成功的方案]
- **洞见**: [学到了什么]
### 4.3 核心实现
[关键代码/架构图/流程图]
---
## 五、效果评估
### 5.1 性能结果
| 指标 | 基线 | 目标 | 实际 | 状态 |
|------|------|------|------|------|
| 延迟 | 100ms | <50ms | 35ms | ✅ |
| 吞吐 | 1K/s | >5K/s | 8K/s | ✅ |
### 5.2 vs SOTA 对比
| 维度 | SOTA | 我们 | 差异 |
|------|------|------|------|
| ... | ... | ... | +X% |
### 5.3 业务价值
[具体的业务收益/用户价值]
---
## 六、经验与教训
### 6.1 做对了什么
1. ...
2. ...
### 6.2 可以改进的
1. ...
2. ...
### 6.3 踩过的坑
| 坑 | 原因 | 解决 |
|-----|------|------|
| ... | ... | ... |
---
## 七、后续规划
### 短期 (1-3个月)
- [ ] ...
### 中期 (3-6个月)
- [ ] ...
### 长期
- [ ] ...
---
## 附录
- A. 术语表
- B. 参考资料
- C. 变更历史
2. ADR 模板 (/report adr)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 289 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A d2ffd313f168
report is a skill published in the GitHub repository lisihao/Solar (2 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 1,620 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…