Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lisihao/Solar --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lisihao/SolarWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lisihao/solar/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lisihao/solar/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lisihao/solar/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00299 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00150 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Skill: review
Systematic code review covering correctness, security, style, and test coverage.
Trigger
User says: 审查代码, code review, /review
Steps
- Scope — identify changed files or diff range
- Correctness — logic errors, off-by-ones, null safety, error paths
- Security — OWASP Top 10, secret leakage, injection, path traversal
- Style — naming, comment quality, dead code
- Tests — coverage gaps, missing edge cases
- Output — structured findings with severity (BLOCKER/WARN/NIT)
Output format
## Findings
### BLOCKER
- [file:line] description
### WARN
- [file:line] description
### NIT
- [file:line] description
## Verdict
APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES
Done when
- All BLOCKER findings addressed or explicitly accepted
- Verdict is APPROVE
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 51 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 812514cc3f2f
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository lisihao/Solar (2 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 299 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
sage-review
Deep, platform-neutral code review for PRs and CRs in ONE thorough single pass — design reasoning (Problem Worth Solving & Solution Fit) as one dimension alongside the 9 code-level dimensions, with chain-of-consequences, self-critique, and draft-only comments. The single app-owned source of truth.
audit
Use when the user wants a code review on recent changes — quality, spec, security, or performance feedback. Triggers a multi-level (L1-L5) review with a standalone Reviewer; on NEEDSFIX, offers to apply findings via /hyperflow:plan. Trigger with /hyperflow:audit, "review this change", "review my PR", "audit the diff"…
stage-coach
Consume CocoSentinel per-stage external coach requests and produce stage quality scores.
quality-gate
Orchestrates the QUALITY pipeline stage for egregore work items, running code review, unbloat, and test updates. Use when running quality checks before a PR.
plugin-review
Review plugin quality with tiered checks and dependency scoping. Use for PR and pre-release audits.
code-review
AI-powered code review for diffs and individual files using LLM analysis.