Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/liuyihey/agent-engineering/concise-agent-promptsnpx skills add LiuYihey/Agent-Engineering --skill concise-agent-promptsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LiuYihey/Agent-EngineeringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/liuyihey/agent-engineering/concise-agent-prompts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liuyihey/agent-engineering/concise-agent-prompts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liuyihey/agent-engineering/concise-agent-prompts.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00674 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00337 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
concise-agent-prompts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Concise Agent Prompt Craft
General-purpose guidelines for writing prompt templates used by LLM agents in multi-step pipelines.
1 — The Litmus Test
Every line you write that enters an LLM context must pass one question: "Does the agent need this to decide what to do?" If no, cut it.
Only write what the agent needs to DO or KNOW to act correctly. Never include:
- Delivery meta-commentary — framing, transitions, or narration about the prompt itself (e.g. "You will now analyse…", "The following section covers…").
- Prompt-writer notes — rationale, caveats, or asides intended for a human reader rather than the executing agent.
2 — Defaults & Hygiene
- End every system prompt with a concise directive, e.g.:
Be concise. No preamble, no summary, no template sections.(unless structured output is required downstream). - Strip all filler: greetings, hedging phrases, meta-commentary about the task.
- If the prompt can be understood without a sentence, delete that sentence.
3 — Steer Scope, Not Quotas
- Never hard-code bullet counts, word limits, or truncation rules on model output. These are symptoms of an unclear scope.
- If output is too verbose → shorten and sharpen the prompt, not the output.
- If output misses a dimension → add it to the role description, not a checklist appended to the instruction.
- Regex-stripping or post-hoc trimming of model output is a code smell — fix the prompt first.
4 — Prefer Flowing Prose Over Structured Scaffolding
- Default output format for reasoning / analysis agents: short connected prose, not bullet inventories or category-labeled lists.
- Reserve numbered lists and structured schemas only for agents whose output is consumed by a parser or another agent.
- When you do need structure, specify the minimum structure required — every extra heading or field is a chance for the model to hallucinate filler.
5 — No Hard-Coded Limits or Examples in Prompts
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 64 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 53245feaa890
concise-agent-prompts is a skill published in the GitHub repository LiuYihey/Agent-Engineering (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 674 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…