Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add livlign/claude-skills/plugin install dotnet-coverage-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/livlign/claude-skills/coverage-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/livlign/claude-skills/coverage-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/livlign/claude-skills/coverage-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/livlign/claude-skills/coverage-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/livlign/claude-skills/coverage-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.02469 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01234 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00494 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00247 |
Grade A, and why
coverage-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
coverage-report
Numbers come only from the tool. The model never estimates, infers, or rounds coverage. The model's only role is joining tool output to the manifest's reasons and narrating the observations section.
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/rules/coverage-report.base.md and the repo's
.claude/coverage/refs/coverage-manifest.yml first.
One command, any time
The whole report is one wrapper — no arguments needed (it auto-detects the .sln):
./.claude/coverage/tools/report.sh
It collects coverage, joins it against the manifest, and writes a dated per-run folder
.claude/coverage/reports/<YYYY-MM-DD>/ containing REPORT.md, REPORT.html, and
CANNOT-TEST.md, then prints the Markdown. It exits non-zero only for a check named in the
manifest's gate.enforce (empty by default, so a breach prints as ADVISORY and the script still
succeeds); a failing build or test run is fatal regardless, from run-coverage.sh. Each run writes its own dated folder rather than overwriting a fixed
path, so prior dates are preserved for comparison; override the date with REPORT_DATE=YYYY-MM-DD
to re-emit under a specific day. CANNOT-TEST.md is generated from the manifest cannot_test
entries (grouped by blocking construct, each row citing target, reason, and unlock), not
hand-written. This is the identical join CI runs — the report a developer sees locally is the report on
the PR. When invoked as the coverage-report skill, just run it and surface the result;
don't re-derive numbers by hand.
Steps
-
Run the wrapper.
./.claude/coverage/tools/report.sh(or, before init has copied it,${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/report.sh). Pass a solution path or repo-filter only if auto-detect is wrong. If the tools or solution are missing, report that — never fabricate numbers. All numbers come from the tool + the deterministic join incoverage-gate.py; the model does not parse XML or compute percentages.The script prints
KIT_VERSION=,KIT_DRIFT=andFILE_FILTER=before collecting. Check all three.KIT_DRIFT=is<state> <manifest kit_version> <kit semver>: any state other thancurrentmeans this repo has not been reconciled against the current kit, and the report carries a note saying so. Surface it in one line and namecoverage-redoas what applies it. Do not apply any migration here: a report that quietly changed the measured scope would make its own numbers unreproducible. The one exception is the stale-tool-copy refresh below, which changes no classification. See${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/MIGRATIONS.md("Preflight"). Stale tool copies no longer need asking about:report.shrunskit-sync.pyfirst, which installs the current copies and applies theautomanifest entries, printing[kit-sync]lines for each. Relay those lines and remind the user to COMMIT the changed files, since CI runs the committed copies and not their kit checkout. If the sync printed nothing, the repo was already current. IfFILE_FILTERlacks an exclusion for a shared directory that is present in the repo, stop and fixscope.vendored_pathsbefore trusting the number.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 148 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A 31be490bae61
coverage-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository livlign/claude-skills (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 2,469 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
hyper-tdd
Use when about to write or modify behavior-bearing code — functions, business logic, bug fixes — before writing any production code. Also when the user invokes /hyperclaude:hyper-tdd. Forces a failing test first so you watch it fail for the right reason.
pwp-test
Testing strategy and implementation protocol — structured quality assurance that catches real bugs. Use this skill whenever the user asks to write tests, add test coverage, set up a testing strategy, or asks 'how should I test this'. Also use when they say 'add tests', 'write tests for this', 'test coverage', 'what…
capture
Capture a REAL Claude Code /v1/messages body as a replay fixture, so the HTTP replay arm (.skills/replay) faithfully reproduces Claude Code's cachecontrol breakpoint structure (a hand-authored fixture makes the 1h-TTL knob look like a no-op). Starts a clawback proxy with --capture-body, drives ONE real claude turn…
drive
Drive the REAL claude binary through clawback's PTY channel at a scripted inter-turn gap schedule — the faithful load arm. Because the bytes on the wire are produced by genuine Claude Code, this is the only driver that exercises the 1h-TTL nested-cache-control rewrite (arm A2) authentically. Use for headline/moat…
replay
Drive a reproducible HTTP replay load against a running clawback proxy. Replays one captured /v1/messages fixture at a load profile's inter-turn gap schedule, with built-in carry-over control (fresh path-mode session id + per-block cache nonce). Auth is an OAuth bearer (CLAWBACKOAUTHTOKEN), never an Anthropic API key…
submit-smoke
Cheaply prove the PTY turn-submission mechanism actually lands turns BEFORE any timed or headline run spends real tokens. Runs .skills/submit-smoke/scripts/submitsmoke.sh — one tiny passthrough Haiku block — and checks two independent signals: the driver's own "confirmed N/M" tally AND the count of real (non-ping)…