Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/lkimuk/wuwe/reviewnpx skills add lkimuk/Wuwe --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lkimuk/WuweWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lkimuk/wuwe/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lkimuk/wuwe/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lkimuk/wuwe/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00034 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00017 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00007 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00003 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review skill
Review the supplied artifact for correctness, security, maintainability, and test coverage. Report concrete findings before general suggestions, and distinguish verified defects from risks.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 5 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 02a614403ae2
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository lkimuk/Wuwe (78 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 34 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
quality-gate
Orchestrates the QUALITY pipeline stage for egregore work items, running code review, unbloat, and test updates. Use when running quality checks before a PR.
hatch3r-refactor
Internal code quality improvement workflow without changing external behavior. Use when refactoring code structure, simplifying modules, or improving maintainability.
apply-qa-fixes
Apply QA gate findings then hand back for re-review. Never self-approves or closes. Use when: apply QA fixes, remediate gate FAIL/CONCERNS, /apply-qa-fixes.
aiox-qa
Test Architect & Quality Advisor (Quinn). Use for comprehensive test architecture review, quality gate decisions, and code improvement. Provides thorough analysis including requ...
test-gap-detector
Identify which areas of a proposed change are weakly covered by tests and suggest the minimum high-value tests to add first.
looper-qa
Use when a Looper-managed GitHub repo needs scheduled pre-merge QA — a PR carries the looper:qa label, the spec stage reaches looper:spec-ready, or the Looper reviewer loop requests an independent second pass. Runs the full QA cycle (Looper state probe → PR checkout → ffs code review → language-specific test suite →…