Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/brownfield-onboardingnpx skills add loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular --skill brownfield-onboardinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angularWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/brownfield-onboarding)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/brownfield-onboarding"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/brownfield-onboarding.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00047 | $0.00973 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00487 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00195 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
brownfield-onboarding scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Brownfield onboarding
Goal
Reach a state where /spec works on the next feature, the harness runs green (or with documented baseline drift), and the team is not blocked by years of accumulated lint/coverage debt.
Steps
-
Detect the stack. Run
.github/scripts/detect-stack.sh > .specs/_stack.json. Record:- Java version, Spring Boot version
- DB engine (Postgres/MySQL/H2/…)
- Migration tool (Flyway/Liquibase/none/both)
- Test stack (JUnit 4 vs 5, Testcontainers presence)
- Build tool (Maven only for now)
- OpenAPI spec presence
-
Run the harness once, capture baselines.
./.githu.github/scripts/harness.sh --baseline > .specs/_baseline.jsonResult is committed:
{ "captured_at": "2026-04-18T10:00:00Z", "git_sha": "abc1234", "checkstyle": { "violations": 412 }, "spotbugs": { "high": 3, "medium": 27, "low": 88 }, "jacoco": { "overall_line": 0.71, "overall_branch": 0.58 }, "pit": { "kill_rate": 0.46, "scope": "incremental" }, "archunit": { "violations": 18 }, "openapi": { "present": false }, "dependency_check": { "high": 1, "critical": 0 } } -
Add missing harness layers to the POM. Use
maven-harness-pomskill. Pin to current values, not the targets:- JaCoCo
<minimum>set to current minus 1% (ratchet). - PIT enabled in a profile (
-Ppit), incremental scope only. - ArchUnit rules added with
FreezingArchRule.freeze(...). - Spotless added in
checkmode for new code only initially (use<ratchetFrom>origin/main</ratchetFrom>).
- JaCoCo
-
Generate a starter design.
spring-architectreads the codebase and writes.specs/_starter-design.mddescribing modules-as-they-are, the dominant patterns, and notable deviations. This is the reference for future feature designs ("we already do X, so a new feature should follow X unless an ADR says otherwise"). -
Document the gaps. Write
.specs/_known-debt.mdlisting the things that fail or barely pass:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 84 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 2619bff58f41
brownfield-onboarding is a skill published in the GitHub repository loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular (58 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 973 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
spec-kitty-charter-doctrine
Run charter interview, generation, context, and sync workflows for project governance in Spec Kitty 3.x. Access doctrine artifacts programmatically via DoctrineService. Resolve agent profiles. Load action-scoped governance context iteratively, not all at once. Triggers: "interview for charter", "generate charter"…
spec-kitty-implement-review
Orchestrate the implement-review loop for Spec Kitty work packages using any configured agent. Covers agent dispatch, state transitions, rejection cycles, arbiter escalation, and dependency-aware sequencing across all 13 supported coding agents. Triggers: "implement and review WPs", "run the implement-review loop"…
spec-kitty-mission-review
Review a fully merged Spec Kitty mission post-merge (all WPs done/approved) to verify spec→code fidelity, FR coverage, drift, risks, and security. Triggers: "review the merged mission", "post-merge mission review", "verify the completed mission", "audit the mission implementation", "mission-level acceptance review"…
spec-kitty-program-orchestrate
Orchestrate a multi-repo, multi-mission Spec Kitty program end-to-end: run specify → plan → tasks → implement → review → merge → mission-review → post-merge fixes across several repositories in a defined dependency order, using background sub-agents for parallel work and a pulse-heartbeat safety net for long…
spec-kitty-runtime-next
Drive the canonical spec-kitty next --mission control loop for mission advancement. Load agent profiles at init, apply action-scoped doctrine context at each step boundary, and pull specific tactics/directives on demand. Triggers: "run the next step", "what should runtime do next", "advance the mission", "what is the…
spec-kitty-bulk-edit-classification
Recognize when a mission is a bulk edit and drive the occurrence-classification guardrail on the user's behalf. Triggers: user says any variant of "rename X to Y", "change the terminology", "migrate all occurrences", "replace across the codebase", "the X feature is now the Y feature", "sed everywhere", or any request…