spring-code-review-rubric

spring-code-review-rubric is a skill for Claude Code from loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular. It costs 66 tokens per session (1,308 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A checklist for reviewing changes to Spring Boot 4 code before committing them. It checks requirements traceability, architecture, Spring usage, errors, data access, security, tests, clarity, and migrations.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for pre-commit reviews of Spring changes, including new APIs, package structures, database access, security, test design, dependencies, and migrations.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers find defects and rule violations consistently, and separates issues that must be fixed from those that are merely improvements.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: when-to-use in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths.

Good fit Use it for pre-commit reviews of Spring changes, including new APIs, package structures, database access, security, test design, dependencies, and migrations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-code-review-rubric
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular --skill spring-code-review-rubric
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for spring-code-review-rubric

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-code-review-rubric/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-code-review-rubric)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-code-review-rubric"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-code-review-rubric/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for spring-code-review-rubric

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-code-review-rubric"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-code-review-rubric.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 66 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,308 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00066 $0.01308
Opus 5.5 $0.00026 $0.00523
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00262
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00131

Measured 1mo ago against content hash f9799f39b63a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

spring-code-review-rubric scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/spring-code-review-rubric/SKILL.md · 127 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Spring code review rubric

Severity ladder

  • blocker — must fix before commit. (Security hole, broken behavior, gate-bypass.)
  • major — must fix before commit OR document as ADR + waiver.
  • minor — should fix; leave a note if not.
  • nit — taste; mention once, don't insist.

Ten sections

1. Traceability

  • Every diff hunk maps to an AC-NNN and a T-NNN.
  • Files-in-scope honored (no edits outside the task's declared paths).
  • Any new public API has a test referencing the AC.

2. Architecture

  • Module boundaries respected (no internal cross-imports).
  • ArchUnit rules pass (see archunit-rules).
  • Layering correct (no controller→repository skip).
  • No new circular dependency.

3. Spring idioms

  • Constructor injection only (spring-boot-4-conventions).
  • Package layout is by feature/domain, not by layer (no top-level controller/service/repository/model packages).
  • @HttpExchange / RestClient (no new RestTemplate).
  • @MockitoBean, not @MockBean.
  • No @Autowired on fields or constructors.
  • No @SpringBootTest where a slice would do.
  • No Lombok anywhere in the diff (any lombok.* import is a must-fix).
  • No fully-qualified type names (FQNs) inline in code — method parameters, return types, throws clauses, and bodies must use simple names backed by proper import statements at the top of the file. E.g. jakarta.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse response as a parameter is a must-fix; it must be HttpServletResponse response with import jakarta.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse;.

4. Error handling

  • Exceptions translated at the controller boundary, not in the service.
  • Single error envelope shape, documented in OpenAPI.
  • No catch (Exception e) { throw new RuntimeException(e); }.
  • Domain exceptions are checked or sealed, not raw RuntimeException.

5. Data access

  • No N+1 queries (look for entity navigation in a loop).
  • All list endpoints paginated.
  • Migration script forward-only OR rollback documented.
  • No raw SQL with string concatenation.
  • Transactions on services, not controllers.

Read the full file on GitHub · 127 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 127 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A f9799f39b63a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

spring-code-review-rubric is a skill published in the GitHub repository loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular (62 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 1,308 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

spec-kitty-implement-review

Orchestrate the implement-review loop for Spec Kitty work packages using any configured agent. Covers agent dispatch, state transitions, rejection cycles, arbiter escalation, and dependency-aware sequencing across all 13 supported coding agents. Triggers: "implement and review WPs", "run the implement-review loop"…

Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty · 120 tokens

spec-kitty-mission-review

Review a fully merged Spec Kitty mission post-merge (all WPs done/approved) to verify spec→code fidelity, FR coverage, drift, risks, and security. Triggers: "review the merged mission", "post-merge mission review", "verify the completed mission", "audit the mission implementation", "mission-level acceptance review"…

Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty · 155 tokens

spec-kitty-runtime-review

Review runtime-owned outputs using the Spec Kitty review workflow surface, then direct approval or rejection with structured feedback. Triggers: "review this work package", "check runtime output", "approve this step", "review WP", "is this WP ready to approve", "check this implementation". Does NOT handle: setup-only…

Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty · 85 tokens

adversarial-squad

Deploy a bounded, profile-loaded adversarial review squad at an SDD point-cut (post-spec, post-plan, post-tasks, pre-merge, or an ad-hoc decision) so independent doctrine lenses converge on findings one reviewer would miss. Triggers: "deploy a squad", "adversarial squad", "post-tasks anti-laziness pass", "pre-spec…

Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty · 160 tokens

spk-run-review-wp

Review a Spec Kitty work package through the runtime review surface and approve or reject with structured feedback.

Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty · 26 tokens

spk-doctrine-bulk-edit

Recognize bulk-edit missions and apply occurrence classification guardrails before modifying many matching instances.

Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty · 25 tokens