Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular --skill spring-code-review-rubricgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angularWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-code-review-rubric)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-code-review-rubric"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-code-review-rubric/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-code-review-rubric"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular/spring-code-review-rubric.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.01308 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00523 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00262 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
spring-code-review-rubric scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spring code review rubric
Severity ladder
- blocker — must fix before commit. (Security hole, broken behavior, gate-bypass.)
- major — must fix before commit OR document as ADR + waiver.
- minor — should fix; leave a note if not.
- nit — taste; mention once, don't insist.
Ten sections
1. Traceability
- Every diff hunk maps to an
AC-NNNand aT-NNN. - Files-in-scope honored (no edits outside the task's declared paths).
- Any new public API has a test referencing the AC.
2. Architecture
- Module boundaries respected (no
internalcross-imports). - ArchUnit rules pass (see
archunit-rules). - Layering correct (no controller→repository skip).
- No new circular dependency.
3. Spring idioms
- Constructor injection only (
spring-boot-4-conventions). - Package layout is by feature/domain, not by layer (no top-level
controller/service/repository/modelpackages). @HttpExchange/RestClient(no newRestTemplate).@MockitoBean, not@MockBean.- No
@Autowiredon fields or constructors. - No
@SpringBootTestwhere a slice would do. - No Lombok anywhere in the diff (any
lombok.*import is a must-fix). - No fully-qualified type names (FQNs) inline in code — method parameters, return types,
throwsclauses, and bodies must use simple names backed by properimportstatements at the top of the file. E.g.jakarta.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse responseas a parameter is a must-fix; it must beHttpServletResponse responsewithimport jakarta.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse;.
4. Error handling
- Exceptions translated at the controller boundary, not in the service.
- Single error envelope shape, documented in OpenAPI.
- No
catch (Exception e) { throw new RuntimeException(e); }. - Domain exceptions are checked or sealed, not raw
RuntimeException.
5. Data access
- No N+1 queries (look for entity navigation in a loop).
- All list endpoints paginated.
- Migration script forward-only OR rollback documented.
- No raw SQL with string concatenation.
- Transactions on services, not controllers.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 127 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A f9799f39b63a
spring-code-review-rubric is a skill published in the GitHub repository loiane/specs-driven-development-spring-angular (62 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 1,308 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
spec-kitty-implement-review
Orchestrate the implement-review loop for Spec Kitty work packages using any configured agent. Covers agent dispatch, state transitions, rejection cycles, arbiter escalation, and dependency-aware sequencing across all 13 supported coding agents. Triggers: "implement and review WPs", "run the implement-review loop"…
spec-kitty-mission-review
Review a fully merged Spec Kitty mission post-merge (all WPs done/approved) to verify spec→code fidelity, FR coverage, drift, risks, and security. Triggers: "review the merged mission", "post-merge mission review", "verify the completed mission", "audit the mission implementation", "mission-level acceptance review"…
spec-kitty-runtime-review
Review runtime-owned outputs using the Spec Kitty review workflow surface, then direct approval or rejection with structured feedback. Triggers: "review this work package", "check runtime output", "approve this step", "review WP", "is this WP ready to approve", "check this implementation". Does NOT handle: setup-only…
adversarial-squad
Deploy a bounded, profile-loaded adversarial review squad at an SDD point-cut (post-spec, post-plan, post-tasks, pre-merge, or an ad-hoc decision) so independent doctrine lenses converge on findings one reviewer would miss. Triggers: "deploy a squad", "adversarial squad", "post-tasks anti-laziness pass", "pre-spec…
spk-run-review-wp
Review a Spec Kitty work package through the runtime review surface and approve or reject with structured feedback.
spk-doctrine-bulk-edit
Recognize bulk-edit missions and apply occurrence classification guardrails before modifying many matching instances.